zangatangring
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Jun 2011
- Messages
- 1,425
TonyM said:zangatangring said:If Aguero is the Tevez replace (as you said) who would be the fourth striker that's so maligned here on Bluemoon forum? I've gotta say, all the candidates I here about aren't (IMO) really as convincing as simply keeping him. Lavezzi could (at most, instantly/eventually) achieve suarez's premier league performances. That's a very good achievement to achieve. However, a lavezzi-aguero-balo lineup wouldn't be as effective (IMO) as an Aguero-tevez-Balo lineup.
I think the fourth striker is Guidetti. But if you ask me it's not really 4, it's ...
* 2 Target men, Dzeko and Guidetti and
* Up to 8 versitile forwards/attackers, Ageuro, Balotelli, Silva, Yaya, Milner, SWP, Johnson and maybe Weiss.
If SWP, Johnson and Milner weren't English they'd be gone imo, replaced by world class talent. I'm not sure how Nasri or Lavezzi coming in would shake up that group but I wouldn't be surprised to see Johnson leaving (presuming SWP and Weiss will be kept due to being academy produced which is important for CL).
Sorry for going on and on :-)
I think you're bang on mate.
Don't worry about going on and on, I enjoy it. :).
So formation wise.....? Please note, this is just a single viable formation that I THINK will be deployed in an instrumental game
Richards-Savic-Kompany-Clichy
----------Y.toure-----------
------Silva------Nasri/pastore(don't lose hope!)
----Balo*--Tevez----Aguero*
Aguero, Balo and Tevez will be under that lovely fluid positional interchange that mancini loves. Such a line is where they should show off all their aspects (balo especially) (hence expose all of the defender's mishaps).
For the De jong lovers, this could be subject to change as to how many creative mids seems sensible.
Jjeangi, sorry (in advance to your criticism) :).
EDIT: The creative mids aren't just there to field all the fancy names. Tevez often drops deep and wide (false 9) to link up with the midfield as combinational attacking options.