JoeMercer'sWay
Well-Known Member
Not if we are spunking £150m on our 3 main targets.
There is no comparison between hazard and Sinclair at all. Delph isn't going to be an alternative to our top target, he will be to compliment or provide rest or as cover. You want to spend £40m on an understudy. Someone who isn't going to get in our best 11.
Well City were clearly happy to otherwise they wouldn't have approached Arsenal for Wilshere, not that we know the true valuation.
Delph is filling a spot, a cheap alternative to an A target, who like those mentioned may fill a spot, but is completely inadequate and will offer us little to nothing, and isn't good enough to sit on the bench for us, and anyone telling me they'd be happy for him to line up in our team against Barca or Bayern is just beyond reason, because by accepting his signing you are accepting him being called upon whenever Pelle feels like it.