gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
I don't understand why you're so opposed to financial fair play. Do you want a game run by oil barons and Russian oligarchs, people who care nothing for clubs, treat them as play things and will inevitably asset strip them and walk away when they're bored, to the detriment of well run, solvent clubs? Paul1973, Chelmsford
I am sure Chelsea and City supporters don't want to end up like Portsmouth or Leeds United once their owners get bored. Sam, Sheffield
Whilst their concern for our club's future well being is most touching, of all the arguments relating to our owners the most preposterous is the "getting bored" one.
Who, in all seriousness, could ever get bored of owning a top football club? I can't think of anything more fun, engaging or intoxicating. To be able to shape and mould a sporting brand, especially one that wasn't previously so preeminent, has to be as good as it gets, at least as far as I'm concerned. It is the reason why otherwise profit driven, hard headed businessmen seemingly suspend all logic when owning, and continuing to own, football clubs. It is why no-one can point to an example of anyone unilaterally "walking away" from a top club for reasons other than them making a profit or being compelled to.
Someone who truly believes anyone could "get bored" of ownership, cannot have any real love or understanding of the game.
To paraphrase Samuel Johnson: to be bored of owning a football club is to be bored of life.