bluemonkey71
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 7,138
Nail on the head mate. I’m willing to pay a little more, as long as they also make sure others are paying their fair amount too, as long as I know they’ll fix it all.The most important thing is not the amount of taxes that we pay but where those taxes go. Currently I pay a lot of tax and it seemingly goes towards nothing because everything is broken.
If somebody argued that we could fix the entire country but I have to pay 10% more tax then yes sign me up. The current system where I pay almost as much and get absolutely nothing back doesn't work. The only benefit the Tories can offer is I might pay less tax which is great but it isn't great if even more gets broken.
The question for me is pretty clear. I don't want to waste my money sending migrants to Rwanda or changing equality laws because that makes no difference to me. I want our money to be spent on fixing the things that matter.
I lasted ten mins , julia favoured sunak and he was like an hysterical midget just shouting over everybody , lying through his back teeth as has been proved today . The 45 sec answers limit was ridiculous
Do you seriously believe that the vast majority of the population won't be paying higher taxes if Labour wants to implement their policies in full? Particularly if they do actually commit to balancing the current budget?
So far they've committed to non-doms, VAT on school fees - the revenue from which is highly uncertain - and a windfall tax which would replace one that's already in operation. If you add all of that up, even on optimistic estimates, your probably talking about less than GBP10bn per annum, and probably a fair bit less. Given that annual tax revenue is now 1 trillion, do you think that a less than 1% increase will suffice?
Just watching the BBC News who have pretty much just suggested exactly that by giving prominence to the Treasury letter. Whether it was an intentional ploy by Starmer or not is anybody’s guess but he has demonstrated quite regularly that he’s not an idiot and is quite ruthless so it’s not beyond the realms of possibility that he was happy to give Sunak enough rope to hang himself.In any case the idea that Starmer allowed Sunak to make these claims as some sort of tactical defeat is frankly laughable. He's very wooden, not at all nimble and can't react when something comes back at him.
Just watching the BBC News who have pretty much just suggested exactly that by giving prominence to the Treasury letter. Whether it was an intentional ploy by Starmer or not is anybody’s guess but he has demonstrated quite regularly that he’s not an idiot and is quite ruthless so it’s not beyond the realms of possibility that he was happy to give Sunak enough rope to hang himself.
Nail struck firmly on head. Well saidWho’d have thought it, a sitting PM lying to the country. The Tories have normalised this and we need it to stop.
Just get the fuck out you lying, corrupt, incompetent twats, you are a blight on our country!
Did Covid not happen?