General Election - December 12th, 2019

[inbetween]

No he doesn't you oaf, if he did Rascal would support him and I wouldn't. In the real world, you know the one you don't live in, I support him because he's a democratic socialist (look it up) and Rascal doesn't because he's not an authoritarian socialist, you know that bogymen Corbyn you concoct in your head, that would nationalise the commanding heights of the economy, close down the likes of Eton and Harrow and send Liam Fox to a Re-educations camp on the Yorkshire moors.

For the many not the few....

Non-authoritarians who would like to forceably close down schools? Hmm.

 

[aguero93:20]

Yes, but May's approach patently didn't work did it. Something had to change and at least he has the cojones to do something about it.

It all hangs on what sort of deal he can do with Farage. If he gets Farage's backing - and this is the tricky part - whilst at the same time not alienating more moderate "leavers" - then he's home and dry and Corbyn et all can do what they like and they are still fucked.

But this is no easy task. Farage's openly stated "price" is "a clean break" from the EU and no withdrawal agreement. Can Boris and Farage find a middle ground?

Can Boris hold the middle ground with no centrist MPs in government or parliament while siding with Farage? Dangerous game.

 

[The perfect fumble]

So you're saying Corbyn does not believe in extensive nationalisation? Or is it just "the means of production" part you disagree with? Just to be clear what you mean when you say "no he doesn't you oaf" in response to my assertion.

As I said yesterday, you're odd, very odd.

 

[Chippy_boy]

As I said yesterday, you're odd, very odd.

Would you mind answering the question? Or are you going to just use your normal diversionary tactics?

Are you saying Corbyn does not believe in extensive nationalisation?

 

[Chippy_boy]

Can Boris hold the middle ground with no centrist MPs in government or parliament while siding with Farage? Dangerous game.

There were 318 Tory MPs mate, and he's lost what, 13 of them? The remaining 300-odd are not all extremist right wing nutters. The huge majority of them are not.

 

[BobKowalski]

No he doesn't you oaf, if he did Rascal would support him and I wouldn't. In the real world, you know the one you don't live in, I support him because he's a democratic socialist (look it up) and Rascal doesn't because he's not an authoritarian socialist, you know that bogymen Corbyn you concoct in your head, that would nationalise the commanding heights of the economy, close down the likes of Eton and Harrow and send Liam Fox to a Re-educations camp on the Yorkshire moors.

For the many not the few....

I’d close down bloody Eton. Done more harm to this country than any other institution bar none.

 

[aguero93:20]

There were 318 Tory MPs mate, and he's lost what, 13 of them? The remaining 276 are not all extremist right wing nutters. The huge majority of them are not.

He's already lost 23.

 

[The perfect fumble]

Would you mind answering the question? Or are you going to just use your normal diversionary tactics?

 

[Chippy_boy]

He's already lost 23.

So just the 295 ish remaining then. The point stands.

 

[Chippy_boy]

Says a lot.

You're happy to refute my claim and call me an oaf, and when asked to clarify, this is the best you can do? Noted.

The conclusion is that you agree that Corbyn IS in favour of extensive nationalisation (well he is, so no surprises there) but that you lack the courage and humility to retract your rude comment.