It's the climate change deniers that are usually the ones that cry the loudest about immigration.And it’s not just about climate change. It would be far more straightforward if it was. It’s also about depleting the planet’s resources (and how that will play out geopolitically and militarily when they start to run out), overpopulation, polluting the air and the oceans, devastating wildlife.
Reducing the debate to climate change is insanely simplistic.
I personally think the climate change part of it is not the most consequential for us, or the planet. The planet will recover from the effects of climate change eventually, but possibly not from the impact of our consumption if it goes on for long enough.
It's just that you seem to be a science denier.No, don't believe in that nonsense
Why would you think that. I've had all my jabs and don't believe that covid was a conspiracy.Would love to read your views on covid, vaccines and such.
I’m sure they are completely rational and not conspiratorial at all…
That's the thing I firmly believe in science.It's just that you seem to be a science denier.
Because she wouldnt be allowed into china or india , she has been to the states thoughOK then, she has no credibility with me and many others who don't buy into the climate agenda. If she and all her acolytes really wanted to be taken as serious protesters they would go to he countries I mentioned and protest there, but they won't will they.
What’s this agenda you speak of?Only with people like you who believe in the climate agenda
A population cull is probably the only chance of this planet surviving in its current guise.World population
1951. 2,543,130,380
2023. 8,045,311,447
so in my lifetime the population of the world has increased threefold, and is still increasing by just under 1% per year. Go figure!
Whats more folk in developing nations quite naturally look at the Western nations and say we want cars, tvs, washing machines, pcs and so on. All drawing the Earths resources needing more food, water and energy.
Consequences
Forests cleared for food production
Species eliminated from their natural habitats
Wars to acquire access to food water and energy resources
More production of greenhouse gases and so on.
World economic system based on continuous growth.
Any political party going to tell us to have less children? No chance.
No idea why people ( on either side} keep talking about 'saving the planet'. We're just one species that's been around for a few minutes at the most as far as the plant is concerned. The planet will be just fine with or without humans until the Sun runs out of fuel (or there is some massive collision with something out there). It's pointless ranting on about how we got here and we'll have to adapt to survive. I personally feel that the UK trumpeting about 'leading the world' is utter bollocks. If the UK stopped producing any carbon emissions tomorrow then the slack would probably be taken up by India/China with a couple of months. The Western economy is based on economic 'growth' and we've managed to convince the 'developing' economies that's the right thing to do. As they say "you reap what you sow'.A population cull is probably the only chance of this planet surviving in its current guise.
Won’t happen though and the human race being selfish won’t be changing anytime soon so I guess the big asteroid strike is our only hope..