Harry Kane

[Nails]

Ah yeah, but it was pretty long range I think. People are acting like we battered them, which is the sort of conclusion you can only get from looking at the stats and not actually watching the game. I'd say they were comfortably the more dangerous team for the second half and a good part of the first.

It was 15 yards out, bang in front of the goal and he mishit it wide. Not as bad as Fernandinho’s miss but not far off.

 

[Gray]

 

[Superace]

Ah yeah, but it was pretty long range I think. People are acting like we battered them, which is the sort of conclusion you can only get from looking at the stats and not actually watching the game. I'd say they were comfortably the more dangerous team for the second half and a good part of the first.

We should of been at least 2 up at half time, then the games done.

 

[Nails]

We should of been at least 2 up at half time, then the games done.

Shoulda been 2-0 after 15 mins

 

[Maly]

 

[mosssideblue]

I know, but I would rather wait for another year or two than pay over the odds for a player who will never have any sell-on value, if Kane was 25 I would go full tilt for him, but he is at his peak and any money spent will only be paid off when he retires. Haaland or MBappe could play for 5-8 years and only then will they be Kane’s age.

I understand what you say about sell on value, but the club will have factored that. With Kane, we know we would get 4/5 years return, but with the others, we don't know that as, notwithstanding the fact, they might not even want to come to us, they may get itchy feet after 3 seasons.

 

[MadchesterCity]

Do we have a plan B if we don't get kane?

if you believe BS then no, it's Kane or nothing

 

[MadchesterCity]

I think it's Kane or nothing

how depressing

 

[leo_city]

️

 

[mosssideblue]

how depressing

On the contrary. It says we have identified who we want and will not compromise by chasing others not suited or available.