D
D
Deleted member 87819
Guest
Hasn’t he already played a final?? (Or so I heard, because I don’t remember him on that game...)
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Harry Kane
- Thread starter Super Joey Hart
- Start date
Lovebitesandeveryfing
Well-Known Member
He's a fine footballer. What worries me is that his ankles appear to be made of that wafer stuff that they give you with ice creams.
Taylor
Well-Known Member
So people keep saying but he's played 34 out of 37 games this season.He's a fine footballer. What worries me is that his ankles appear to be made of that wafer stuff that they give you with ice creams.
As undeniable as the ankle concerns are, they have never stopped him scoring goals to be fair.He's a fine footballer. What worries me is that his ankles appear to be made of that wafer stuff that they give you with ice creams.
KennyG
Well-Known Member
He does tend to go missing but perhaps a move away from Spurs would improve that. For a stop gap signing who doesn't need to adapt the league Kane fit that bill
Stop gap? Are you having a laugh? Kane is the best striker in the league. The only gripe is he is nearly 28.
He doesn’t go missing in big games either, in most big games, Spurs are the underdogs. Did you see the recent Spurs v Utd or the league cup final, he was feeding off scraps. He scores 30-40 a season here.
Chi-town blues
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 May 2012
- Messages
- 31,363
Hen.ry kane
At spurs he as always rushed back after each injury and no doubt would've played through some as well. At City, that will never be the case.He's a fine footballer. What worries me is that his ankles appear to be made of that wafer stuff that they give you with ice creams.
dave_blue12
Well-Known Member
The poll on this thread is a fucking embarrassment.
Which weirdos don't want City to sign the most prolific striker in the PL ?
Give your heads a wobble ffs !
Which weirdos don't want City to sign the most prolific striker in the PL ?
Give your heads a wobble ffs !
Because it's obviously highly correlated to Haaland. Signing Kane would mean we don't sign Haaland.The poll on this thread is a fucking embarrassment.
Which weirdos don't want City to sign the most prolific striker in the PL ?
Give your heads a wobble ffs !
I am sticking by that. He's isn't a terrible player but not spectacular either.Stop gap? Are you having a laugh? Kane is the best striker in the league. The only gripe is he is nearly 28.
He doesn’t go missing in big games either, in most big games, Spurs are the underdogs. Did you see the recent Spurs v Utd or the league cup final, he was feeding off scraps. He scores 30-40 a season here.