Harry Kane


Their dreams of a striker that was promised are ending. Oh, well. Bad Benzema.
 
100m for a 29-year-old (turning 30 next month) with 1 year left in the contract? Looks like exactly the kind of deal Madrid would make. lol Good way to repeat the Hazard success, am I right?
 

Their dreams of a striker that was promised are ending. Oh, well. Bad Benzema.
They make out they spend zero money they're absolutely thick as fuck
 
They make out they spend zero money they're absolutely thick as fuck
They will have to make do with some of their cheap pick-ups, Sancho, Antony or Martial. The weak, the spinning and the injured. Or Rashford, who apparently doesn't jump. I think their best striker in recent times has been Ibrahimovich. At least, Raiola, for all his reputations, delivered and scored. Good luck to them.
 
Are these the same people? Otherwise, what you’re saying is; hold the press, people on a forum have differing opinions! And you’re just merging isolated comments to suit your agenda.

Given the percentages, largely the same people yes. Slow day with nothing else to be irritated by?
 

Their dreams of a striker that was promised are ending. Oh, well. Bad Benzema.
Someone tell the daft fucker that it's always been pay to win, ever since Preston signed the best Scottish players on top wages to win the first FL title in 1889.
 
Someone tell the daft fucker that it's always been pay to win, ever since Preston signed the best Scottish players on top wages to win the first FL title in 1889.
Spurs will be crying because their legend is ditching them like second-hand goods. Ten Hag will be crying as he has been telling the world that he has done a masterful work, all undone by the lack of a serviceable striker. Hopefully, Real Madrid will be crying because Kane won't be compatible with their golden boy, Vinicius Jr. Vini needs a runner just as Ronaldo had runners in Higuain and Benzema.
 

Their dreams of a striker that was promised are ending. Oh, well. Bad Benzema.
The last time I looked, we'd spent £80m more on transfers over the last 10 years than the rags.

HOWEVER, we recouped £460m in transfer fees, with the rags achieving less than half that figure. The average cost of our 5 most expensive players is £60m, ManUre's is £80m!

Having the money to spend is one thing. Spending it wisely & managing the squad properly is another thing altogether.

Finally, ManUre outbid City on Pogba, Sanchez, Maguire, Fred & Ronaldo, meaning we moved onto other targets.

Their fans were cockahoop because this apparently proved ManUre's financial superiority over City, & reinforced the rag's notion that Old Toilet will always remain a bigger draw for elite players than the Etihad.

They've got short memories, probably affected by liberal amounts of whisky & spice! \0/
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.