Harry Kane

[goalmole]

Someone tell the daft fucker that it's always been pay to win, ever since Preston signed the best Scottish players on top wages to win the first FL title in 1889.

He knows that already.
The problem for him is that it's not them winning anymore.

 

[DJ1]

Hope he stays at Spurs just so I can hear him try and say Postecoglou

...the gaffer (you have to say it with the lisp)

 

[DJ1]

View attachment 83618
View attachment 83619

I know you can only play against the team in front of you but there's a lot of goals there against bang average teams (and that's being generous)

 

[fulabeer]

 

[franksinatra]

If we do have money to spend he would still be a fantastic signing for us. Would love to see him in the number 10 role as I think he has the intelligence and passing range to play there for a number of years, plus if he does move to a rival he strengthens those sides considerably.

 

[Semper aggressus]

Why would we sign him when we have Haaland?

 

[StillBluessinceHydeRoad]

Why would we sign him when we have Haaland?

...and Alvarez?

 

[TonyM]

I would.

He could play anywhere up front. Even out wide to stretch the opposition. (And so can Alvarez and Haaland actually)

 

[Sir peace frog]

he would score a hatful if he played for us,and i think he would be great upfront with big erl , imagine for a second,kane went to madrid to win trophies, won nothing and spurs did the double :)

 

[rickmcfc]

Haaland and Alvarez. We don’t need Kane.

With the departure of Walker, Gundogan, Bernardo to name but a few, the top of the pitch is an area we don’t need to strengthen or focus on