to counter act the people dont rate/want Kane argument, the narrative needs to stop that Haaland would stay at City for 10 years plus? He wants to play in La Liga and has also said Italy at some point so you MAY get 5 years out of him? Haaland also reportedly wants a starting salary higher than KDB which doesnt fit with our squad harmony policy etc and then i personally think pep wants the mino circus every couple of seasons if Haaland is smashing goals in wanting more money etc? I think the club are looking at the next 2-3 years and know that Kane is settled in England, knows the league, has a professional attitude, never out on the piss, affordable and non boat rocking wages and taking all that into consideration have chosen him to be the man for us.
It is not narrative. It is a fact that he Could stay for 10+ years. Whether he would or wouldn't is conjecture. But he could, and that is what makes the money worth something. And even if he doesn't, he would be worth a lot anf you could buy another haaland if he were sold, or pocket the money. He could of course run his contract down but that doesn't happen often and it is a small risk in an otherwise logical move with many benefits.
In the same way, it is pretty much a fact that Kane couldn't play at that level beyond 5. Probably fortunate if he does all 5 tbf.
The rest is pure guesswork based on nonsense. Wage demands, agent shenanigans, what he drinks and what his attitude might be, tabloid horseshit.
There is also the simple fact that Haaland is just a better player than Kane. Not just what he might become, but currently too, if you have watched both. Both in ability and physical attributes, particularly pace.
Which makes him a far more worthwhile and logical transfer, at the prices being assumed.
If the club have decided to go for Kane and they do, and get him, great. I'm not convinced it will quite play out like that and am keeping an open mind Haaland being on the agenda at some point in the summer.
