Harry Kane

[Blootoof]

Remember Wilfried Bony..?

Has he even moved yet? I don't mean to a new club. I mean actually moved.

 

[ONTHERUNWITHTHAKSIN]

Could argue Kane is more experienced and proven at top level.
World Cup golden boot winner
Premier league golden boot winner

Yes agreed

Arguments for both

Either will do me

 

[doobyedoobye]

would the employees be buzzing about Kane though? Or maybe its across the signings in the window?

Maybe Kane and Grealish

 

[Lavinda Past]

Really?
I think if he signs for Chelsea he’s just a mercenary who went for the big money move

Whether or not he's a City fan doesn't matter a jot.
Whatever any player says, the simple fact is that they will always follow the money. That's perfectly reasonable - As with any professional, it's how they make a living. That's why they pay agents to negotiate deals for them.
The very idea that a player would dismiss a deal because he isn't a fan of a particular club is risible.
They're ALL mercenaries, whoever they sign for, and good luck to them as far as I'm concerned.
If a club is stupid enough to throw daft money at them, it's not their fault

 

[bluemanchester]

I understand a lot of fans are against a £100M+ deal for Kane as they see the club as dear to their hearts and dont want them to be seen to have the clubs knickers pulled down by the allegedly top rated negotiator Levy. My question to this is if Levy is this super super negotiator why are Spurs crap.

 

[Blue_Rossy]

Maybe Kane and Grealish

Id be over the moon with either or both them signings, not arsed what they cost.

 

[Semper aggressus]

Whether or not he's a City fan doesn't matter a jot.
Whatever any player says, the simple fact is that they will always follow the money. That's perfectly reasonable - As with any professional, it's how they make a living. That's why they pay agents to negotiate deals for them.
The very idea that a player would dismiss a deal because he isn't a fan of a particular club is risible.
They're ALL mercenaries, whoever they sign for, and good luck to them as far as I'm concerned.
If a club is stupid enough to throw daft money at them, it's not their fault

They are, which is why occasionally we need to throw daft money at one or two to ensure we stay ahead of Chelsea, who seem to have no qualms about doing so.

 

[Mike Cledford]

No deal is a done deal, till the player is grinning holding up the shirt or sat next to the grey jumper cutout, pen in hand.

And imo, no player is an exclusive target, or wven strictly head and shoulders above all else a no.1 target.

Just as my observation to how the club have done business.


Hence my reluctance to believe kane is the only one we are after. I'd be saying the same if it were Haaland the claims were about.

I will always remember that press conference when we revealed Yaya and Metlin to an audience of hacks blinking in their lack of knowledge of who these players were, before going back to their offices to look them and then write articles running them down.
Another like that will do me fine.

 

[Rammy Blue]

They are, which is why occasionally we need to throw daft money at one or two to ensure we stay ahead of Chelsea, who seem to have no qualms about doing so.

Which is exactly why we should be throwing silly money at Dortmund to get Haaland.

 

[DMA's]

I will always remember that press conference when we revealed Yaya and Metlin to an audience of hacks blinking in their lack of knowledge of who these players were, before going back to their offices to look them and then write articles running them down.
Another like that will do me fine.

With respect I think that is more a reflection of the lack of knowledge English journos have of the European game rather than toure and silva being relative unknowns.

yaya toure had already won the champions league at Barca and David silva had just won the World Cup with Spain and was being chased by Madrid and United amongst others . Both where very highly rated players