Harry Kane

[BertTrautmann'sParachute]

Keep this **** away from us.

 

[doobyedoobye]

Hopefully his people leaking info that he’s up for a new challenge

 

[balotellishaircut]

I think City will assess his injury record and Spuds wanting £100m and say No Thanks.

 

[Dobsy]

I doubt we could get him for £100m, plus he's 27 now and we tend to invest in younger players.

 

[omri]

28 in the summer.

have 3 4 good more years.

 

[waspish]

Really he could have 6/7 years playing at the top! players look after themselves now a days much better.

 

[ONTHERUNWITHTHAKSIN]

Really he could have 6/7 years playing at the top! players look after themselves now a days much better.

Someone needs to tell his ankles that

 

[PistonBlue]

Quality player would improve us massively - just think about the amount of chances we miss.
But not going to happen.

 

[Brad mcfc]

Rather use the 100 mil to try and get Haaland.

 

[LucahArchie10]

No chance, just dont see Levy letting go 9f his prize asset & definitely not for £90-100m you can add another 40-50m with the tightest chairman in the business

Even at 27 or 28 in the summer he is a great player but just dont see him moving North

 

[HelloCity]

I think City will assess his injury record and Spuds wanting £100m and say No Thanks.

I think if City could get Harry Kane for as little as £100m then they’d be making a world record fastest journey to London to sign him. Unfortunately the fee would be a lot more than that what with him being one of the world’s greatest forwards.

 

[balotellishaircut]

I think if City could get Harry Kane for as little as £100m then they’d be making a world record fastest journey to London to sign him. Unfortunately the fee would be a lot more than that what with him being one of the world’s greatest forwards.

Well I think we have to agree to disagree.

 

[Segga]

no doubt he will be on the radar if we are serious about getting a striker in this summer. Hope he’s not number one target though (Haaland) but he would be guaranteed 25+ goals a season if he stayed fit.

 

[HelloCity]

Well I think we have to agree to disagree.

His goal scoring record would suggest he’s factually one of the best forwards in the world so feel free to disagree with the facts.

 

[Kinkladze 1]

A lot of people saying no thanks but not giving a reason. Can’t see why we wouldn’t want him personally. He’s begrudgingly better than Jesus and the current version of Aguero. And if you can’t accept that you really need to do something about those blue tinted glasses you have on.

 

[burnley blue mcfc]

I’d have him at city in a heartbeat, sure he’ll cost mega bucks but proven prem lg striker so it’s not a gamble on that front, he’d get 30+ goals every season given the amount of chances we create & often miss!!

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

I think if City could get Harry Kane for as little as £100m then they’d be making a world record fastest journey to London to sign him. Unfortunately the fee would be a lot more than that what with him being one of the world’s greatest forwards.

And as soon as he was clad in sky blue the RDAHMeedya would be describing him as a diving bastard, and how easily a twelve stone six footer goes so easily to ground.

 

[Ban-jani]

He’s the best centre forward on the planet.

Anything under £120m would be the bargain of the century.

 

[Deleted member 81382]

I wouldn't say no but I'd much rather have Haaland.

 

[Withnail]

He’s the best centre forward on the planet.

Anything under £120m would be the bargain of the century.

Kane is good, but not on the same level as Lewandowski.