Harry Kane

[TonyColemansbagofapples]

Maybe it's more correct to say that Spurs don't behave like a big club. Their trophy haul over the last fifty years has been rather meagre.

 

[nmc]

As much as I don't like Tottenham, they're hardly a nothing club. They've got a big stadium, big fanbase, a big history, and much like Man City, an Amazon documentary.

BUT haven't won a league title in almost 60 years !

 

[Trojan1962]

Their new ground will fuck them up massively in terms of debt and ability to attract the very best players.
Kane is the best we have but injuries/age and the money that horrible **** levy will demand make it unviable
Cant say too much about the Spurs fan base apart from the ones I’ve met and they have all been deluded and consider themselves to be a bigger club than ourselves. I remind them about winning trophies and the 29k they got for a premier league game whilst they were at Wembley only 2 years ago. They don’t seem to have an answer to these points.

 

[kun]

As much as I don't like Tottenham, they're hardly a nothing club. They've got a big stadium, big fanbase, a big history, and much like Man City, an Amazon documentary.

Sunderland have all that

 

[The1nvisibleMan]

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

He could always invoke the Webster ruling lol

 

[The1nvisibleMan]

He could always invoke the Webster ruling lol

How does that work? I’ve heard of it before but cannot remember where

 

[Gumzy97]

How does that work? I’ve heard of it before but cannot remember where

Specifically, it states that any player who signed a contract before the age of 28 can buy himself out of the contract three years after the deal was signed. If he is 28 or older the time limit is shortened to two years.

 

[Thaksinssoldier]

Would rather give Dortmund 150 mil than give it to a rival for a player who is injury prone and proven himself to be selfish.

 

[SPIDERBOY]

How does that work? I’ve heard of it before but cannot remember where

Think it means a player can not be held to a contract for more than 3 years or summat....but need to be 28yo or more....may be or probably am wrong.

 

[Deleted member 87819]

I keep saying... PSG. I watched bits of them tonight, struggling in the Coupe de France against a team that has a 43 year old CB. Pocchetino could really use him there

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

How does that work? I’ve heard of it before but cannot remember where

It wouldn’t apply here, I don’t think. It’s to do with a player being able to walk away from their contract if they aren’t being played for a large period of time.

Clubs have basically said they won’t use it to get players on the cheap, and so far they’ve kept that up.

Donny van der Beek might be looking into it though.

 

[The1nvisibleMan]

Think it means a player can not be held to a contract for more than 3 years or summat....but need to be 28yo or more....may be or probably am wrong.

Would he risk pissing off the Spurs fans like that though?

 

[nmc]

He could always invoke the Webster ruling lol

He’ll probably spend the rest of his career in the courts....

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Would he risk pissing off the Spurs fans like that though?

Hugely. His legacy would be destroyed like Sol Campbell’s.

 

[Gumzy97]

Webster Rule

Specifically, it states that any player who signed a contract before the age of 28 can buy himself out of the contract three years after the deal was signed. If he is 28 or older the time limit is shortened to two years.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

He’ll probably spend the rest of his career in the courts....

Trying to confirm his name and addreth?

 

[The1nvisibleMan]

Hugely. His legacy would be destroyed like Sol Campbell’s.

He’s gotta weigh up his options big time this summer I reckon. I don’t like the idea of giving that much money to a rival though as has been mentioned. However, seeing how they spent the Bale money I wouldn’t be too afraid

 

[SPIDERBOY]

Would he risk pissing off the Spurs fans like that though?

He aint got more than 5 year left in him with his injuries,if that,imo.
If he wants a couple of medals in the bag,he's gonna have to piss them off.
He aint winning fuck all there.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

He’s gotta weigh up his options big time this summer I reckon. I don’t like the idea of giving that much money to a rival though as has been mentioned. However, seeing how they spent the Bale money I wouldn’t be too afraid

Most of any money they get in would be needed to help service their stadium debt.

If I was Levy, I’d price him out of the market so that he either stays or they get a fortune for him.

I can’t see Kane going on strike etc for the same legacy issues as the Webster ruling would cause.