The longer they haggle the narrower the buying window, for a new striker, becomes.
They need to take the offer and get on with their lives.
If Laporte is staying , I can't see Ake wanting to be 4th choice, Ake has already been here a year so we will have already had amortisation of his original fee.That would make the deal nearly £170 mill we wouldn’t do that ,besides we won’t let Ake go. We’ll pay 120/130 with add ons up to £150 mill.
That would surely be more of a pain in the arse? Which good player would agree to go there for less money and no champions league? City would be better doing £130m plus add ons to £150m and then maybe selling someone for £50-60m? Bernardo Silva maybe?
Sandler looked quality yesterday. But I still rate Ake.If Laporte is staying , I can't see Ake wanting to be 4th choice, Ake has already been here a year so we will have already had amortisation of his original fee.
We also have Sandler, a huge talent if he is over his injuries, he could be 4th choice.
Ake is ok and much too good to be 4th choice.Sandler looked quality yesterday. But I still rate Ake.
I still think Ake may feature as a left back on occasion.Ake is ok and much too good to be 4th choice.
possibly, but with Mendy, Zinch ,Laporte, Cancelo, even that will be difficult.I still think Ake may feature as a left back on occasion.
Not if Levy has no intention of spending the Kane money. Last min job, we had no time to get a replacement…sorry.The longer they haggle the narrower the buying window, for a new striker, becomes.
They need to take the offer and get on with their lives.
That's not how amortisation works.If Laporte is staying , I can't see Ake wanting to be 4th choice, Ake has already been here a year so we will have already had amortisation of his original fee.
We also have Sandler, a huge talent if he is over his injuries, he could be 4th choice.
I still think Ake may feature as a left back on occasion.
I like Ake.That is what I would like to see, fuck off mendy and have Ake/Zinc compete for LB
If Laporte is staying , I can't see Ake wanting to be 4th choice
Villa are idiots. Maybe Grealish wont go, but there is a high chance he will, so why haven't they spent the £100m up front? I know they've made a couple of signings but imo they will struggle next season without Grealish.
exactly so as of now he cost us 32m, added with 120m for Kane, it's a decent deal.That's not how amortisation works.
He signed a 5 year deal so 1/5 of his fee will have been amortised(?) and 4/5 or 32m will still be left
Not so sure he was 4th choice last summer, Stones career looked over, no Dias, Laporte struggling for form and fitness.He was perfectly happy to come and be 4th choice a year ago. If he's changed his mind over the last year he shouldn't have come.
Ings, as you say, wouldn’t be a bad shout for a PL ready, short term option. Long term, I think Spurs have Vlahovic in mind. He won’t give us everything that Kane gives us, though.There’s definitely the opportunity to do so.
There is a dearth of number 9s though. You’d be looking at Ings etc as a temporary replacement.
Nuno might be able to work with amended again though if he has some promising younger players.
I‘ve no idea what the fee would be for Kane. The more north of £100m, the more uncomfortable I get.