Harry Kane

Kane wants out we keep hearing yet why the bloody hell did he sign such a long contract.
I was shocked when I read that, my thought than was he has given up any hope of winning anything. He wont get out of spurs easily what a numpty.

Still think the same ! Signing such a long contract was mad.
 
johnnymarrsbarres said:
We’ve made a record signing for the most talked about and most promising player in the country, and we’re very close to signing the Premier League golden boot holder, World Cup golden boot holder and England captain.

Both of which are desperate to leave their boyhood clubs where they were adored to move to City because we’re fucking mint.

A bit of perspective please.
Click to expand...
We didn't need Grealish. Yeah, he is a great player but if you look at the bigger picture the first thing what we should've done is signing a striker. If that means our budget got limited because of that, and therefore we don't have the money anymore to replace a strike, which we currently also do not have, then it is a not so clever decision.
 
blue61 said:
So the news today is the Levy is refusing to talk about Kane to anyone, that is exactly the same story from a week or so ago

I would expect in the next couple of days either we see it as a lost cause if indeed Levy doesn't want to negotiate, which I doubt is the case and let it known we are walking away.

Alternatively Kane will put in a transfer request and then he really takes the blame and Levy will accept a very good offer and one that is affordable to City and the deal will get done.

There is no doubt that Spurs are looking to sell Kane but are hindered by the fact they cant get his replacement

The end game in either an agreed deal or no deal will be reached if not signed in the next few days imo.
Click to expand...
I think City are hoping Spurs will sell as the window gets closer but whether there is any prospect of that who knows.

Levy can do what he wants. Whether he is wise to turn down £100m plus for a 28 year old who wants to leave is their decision. I know what I would do and that gives me hope. I don't rate Levy and I can see now why they are struggling. They should have moved ages ago to get the best money for the player, and the best replacements. Now they will either leave it so late that they can't replace him, or they wont sell him at all and they will inherit a cloud over their club.
 
why on earth would spurs want to keep hold of a player that’s publicly stated they want to leave. yes he will continue to perform for them, yes he will score them goals, but he would be doing all of this knowing his club have screwed him out of a move. surely having a player in the changing room and on the pitch who clearly doesn’t want to be there will have some effect on their performance. it’s a toxic atmosphere all around.

i think it’s a done deal and all of the media bullsh*t is just to keep everyone focussed on kane whilst they quietly do business elsewhere. remember villa with ings? not a whiff until it was announced.
 
King-General said:
We didn't need Grealish. Yeah he is a great player but if you look at the bigger picture the first thing what we should've done is signing a striker. If that means our budget got limited because of that, then it is a not so clever decision.
Click to expand...
But it makes no difference. We're apparently offering £100m plus for Kane and they don't want to sell so following your strategy we'd have no Grealish and no Kane.
 
Big-P said:
The fact we have no back up option of another striker, even for a year, stinks of pure arrogance. If we don’t get a striker we WILL struggle. Last year was a fluke and ultimately, everyone else was crap. I doubt we would be as successful without a striker this year.
A disaster.
Click to expand...
A Disaster!
Losing a family member early is a disaster, not not signing a sportsman.
 
King-General said:
We didn't need Grealish. Yeah, he is a great player but if you look at the bigger picture the first thing what we should've done is signing a striker. If that means our budget got limited because of that, and therefore we don't have the money anymore to replace a strike, which we currently also do not have, then it is a not so clever decision.
Click to expand...

well foden is injured, gundogan is 31 and just got injured, KDB gets injuries every season?
 
hihosilva said:
Depending on whether Kane travels with the spurs squad today will most likely give an indication to how close this deal is.
Click to expand...
They said in last nights papers hes not travelling to stay and work on his fitness
 
King-General said:
We didn't need Grealish. Yeah, he is a great player but if you look at the bigger picture the first thing what we should've done is signing a striker. If that means our budget got limited because of that, and therefore we don't have the money anymore to replace a strike, which we currently also do not have, then it is a not so clever decision.
Click to expand...
The club knew what would happen with the Kane transfer and that it would drag on. Grealish was relatively simple as he wanted to come and had a release clause. Villa couldn’t dig their heels in. Got the easy deal out the way first. Simple logic really
 
give it to gordon said:
Kane wants out we keep hearing yet why the bloody hell did he sign such a long contract.
I was shocked when I read that, my thought than was he has given up any hope of winning anything. He wont get out of spurs easily what a numpty.

Still think the same ! Signing such a long contract was mad.
Click to expand...
He signed a new deal in 2018, they got to the semis of carabao and runners up in the CL final as well as finishing 4th that year. A great season compared to usual and he probably felt things were going in the right direction.

They then imploded and now he wants out.
 
johnnymarrsbarres said:
We’ve made a record signing for the most talked about and most promising player in the country
Click to expand...

He's just neither of those. He's a good creator who scores the odd goal and struggles to get minutes for England. His numbers last year of 6 goals 10 assists put him roughly equal with Danny Ings, Jack Harrison, Michail Antonio and Chris Wood for contributions. He's also less effective than either of the left wingers he will be inexplicably replacing, one of whom is probably the best player who'll ever come through our academy. We didn't need Grealish. We do need a striker.
 
richards30 said:
No champions league or even decent european competiton is going to stop top strikers going there to be honest mate, i personally think that is the problem, they cant get a replacement so have thought fuck it, we wont let kane leave now.
Click to expand...
Well if his brinksmanship is to try to prove his loyalty to whoever AV style it is admirable but Ill advised.

Surely replacements would be made readily available to him by those he wants to please unless of course he is not trusted and they have isolated him to ensure a no sale?
 
Bustergonad said:
The club knew what would happen with the Kane transfer and that it would drag on. Grealish was relatively simple as he wanted to come and had a release clause. Villa couldn’t dig their heels in. Got the easy deal out the way first. Simple logic really
Click to expand...
The club should've have an alternative, if things doesn't go the direction they thought it should. And currently we do not have that. Simple logic actually.
 
Bustergonad said:
The club knew what would happen with the Kane transfer and that it would drag on. Grealish was relatively simple as he wanted to come and had a release clause. Villa couldn’t dig their heels in. Got the easy deal out the way first. Simple logic really
Click to expand...
But that 'simple' deal took an age, this will rumble on until a couple of days before the window slams shut
 
Big-P said:
The fact we have no back up option of another striker, even for a year, stinks of pure arrogance. If we don’t get a striker we WILL struggle. Last year was a fluke and ultimately, everyone else was crap. I doubt we would be as successful without a striker this year.
A disaster.
Click to expand...
I would have gone for Ings myself or Lacazette but they will be ridiculed and I can see why when the alternative is Kane. I suspect City might make a late move for an alternative short term signing. If Lacazette is injury free then I think he would be a good short-term buy.
 
King-General said:
The club shouldve have an alternative, if things doesn't go the direction they thought it should been. And currently we do not have that. Simple logic actually.
Click to expand...
"an alternative"
So we are looking for another world class striker who just happens to be on the sidelines waiting for us to call.

If we can't sign Kane we sign no one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top