Has the BBC become a Tory tool?

I note that not all sports pundits agree with Gary Linekers right to speak out on political issues, Jonathan Agnew has said in the past that he would have been sacked for expressing his opinions like Lineaker has.

Lineker responded to agnew with his usual superior arrogance which is why is dislike him.

I wonder how many actually agree with what he has said or his right to tweet it, obviously two different things, but closely intertwined.
 
Woke up to still see multiple reports about this issue. Am I right in saying that despite being employed as a freelancer Lineker still has to follow BBC guidelines about impartiality? Whether you agreed with his comments or not isn’t it the case that in the opinion of his bosses he has broken these guidelines or is the argument that he hasn’t? Personally I think he is a boring, overpaid, smug twat who thinks he is really funny when the reality is he isn’t.
 
Might give MOTD a go tonight(dependant on results),but if they do need someone to do the introductions, how about Clive ,if he can do Mastermind and calmly stand in a war zone, he could cope with reading out the names of a few football clubs.As for pundits,if really necessary, V.K. and Buzzer would be my choice.
 
I'm actually amazed that the thread has the title as a question. And that some think it's not the case.

I can only presume that when you're stood that extremely far over to the right, everything else appears to be to the left. This government are slowly whipping up hatred, currently for migrants, as a form of keeping control by division. Where will they stop? Who knows. Everyone who wants this to be a decent country should call them out when needed.
When I look at England and see that David Attenborough and Gary Lineker can be portrayed as politically subversive, it is deeply concerning.
 
But it’s not wrong. Much of the language used by the Tories and their policies bear a striking resemblance to the Nazis in the1930’s.

Here are just a few off the top of my head.

1. Control of the media
2. Removal of worker’s rights
3. Repeated lies
4. Targeting minorities (asylum seekers)
5. Squashing dissent both inside and outside of the party. All dissenters to the direction of the part were removed before the 2019 GE.
6. International isolation.
7. Removing power of the courts
8. Interference in the election process. The Electoral Commission is now under government control. Photo ID to vote makes voting much more difficult for sections of society.

I could go but have things to do.

Or you could have said many of your examples also apply to most other countries and governments at one time or another ;)
 
I didn't say he did compare with the Holocaust?

He's associated the Tories with the Nazis, which is just plain wrong regardless of the semantics of interpreting his language.

He didn't, unless that is the semantics someone chooses to fuss over. It wasn't wrong either, nor the first time it has happened, the comparison has been made lots of times before. The billboards, the flyers, the vans that went round, windrush, etc. This is just the latest, and yes the language IS very much that of then 1930s (note not the holocaust which was a whole decade later, if we are going down the semantics rabbit hole). And it absolutely should be drawn to attention and the comparison not only made but dwelled on. Regardless of what party does it, and what position of power they are in. And we should as a public be sensible enough to recognise it and admit it, not go off on tangents using technicalities and tribalism to ensure we don't budge on the divide.
 
Never watch it anyway until it is on iplayer.
That way I can just see what they say about City and forward every thing else.
I watch the highlights on YouTube more than motd.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.