BillyShears
Well-Known Member
The problem is that while the three goals were indeed soft and can't fairly be laid at the door of poor management one must consider the rest of the game.I still cannot bear to watch the game again but I reckon they should have scored at least 3 more goals and looked dangerous every time they crossed the half way line. On the contrary we caused them few problems and in general looked disorganised and unsure about what we were trying to do. That surely has to be at least partly the managers fault. I think Sunday could turn out to be one of Pelligrini's most defining games at City.
I wouldn't disagree that we were poor going forward. We have been poor going forward for some time now. Part of the issue with that though is that Silva's either injured or unbelievably out of form, and Toure is a man of diminishing returns with each passing hour. That means that the two players who in recent history have been key to our attacking play just aren't there at the moment. On top of that, there's a KDB sized hole in our play because whilst Toure/Silva weren't delivering but he was in the side, at least we had A N Other player who could deliver telling passes, crosses, etc. His injury put paid to that too.
None of that by the way, is to absolve Pellegrini of ultimate responsibility. As the manager of the side, no matter what the reasons for underperformance, he must ultimately take responsibility as it's his side. He needs to find solutions to injury crisis' to players being out of form, to teams exposing the same weakness in certain players. There are many things which he did on Saturday that I really didn't agree with. Both in terms of team selection, and team shape. I also fully agree about Sunday behind one of the most defining games in Pellegrini's time at City - but honestly we've been here before too. Particularly in the CL where we have gotten huge results under him in huge pressure situations.
One thing I don't agree with though, is when people say things like "If not for Joe Hart". Hart's a goalkeeper and is paid to make big saves. He isn't there to be a spectator so as last line of defence when he does his job I'm delighted, but that doesn't automatically mean there's something catastrophically wrong with the way we're playing. Any side who plays as high up the pitch as we do will be susceptible to counter attacks and will require the four defenders plus the g/k to do their jobs diligently. We're unlucky that our defenders can't do that rather than lucky that our g/k can.