without a dream
Well-Known Member
To me those targets don't equate. In a tight season 70 points will be top 4 at worst a couple of points off it. That's a fair bit different to top 6 imo.
moomba said:So the upshot is that the chairman states that we had a target (presumably of top 4) agreed between the board and coaching staff. Hughes says his target was top 6 or 70 points (we were on target for 64 points after the match).
So someones telling porkies, I guess people will believe who they want to believe.
The next bit is that we decided to sack him, and didn't warn him about it before we got a replacement. Am I not wrong but is not the sort of thing that every one of us would want the club to do. Being professional some would call it.
KentBlue said:How the fukc can anyone say they're ashamed to support the club?
I don't think even if I was being tortured I could ever say those words (unless, of course, the torture involved having to listen to Westlife's Greatest Hits whilst being forced to watch endless re-runs of The Lenny Henry Show).
Regardless of what happens in the boardroom, we cheer on the players who wear the shirt and take to the pitch - that's what we pay our money for. Opinions can and will be divided over the manager's decisions (tactics, selections, etc), but when all is said and done we support the team that represents the club, not the blokes in suits.
GaudinoMotors said:Jumping to assumptions as ever - what do you know about what was agreed - even the club said top six on the OS.
moomba said:GaudinoMotors said:Jumping to assumptions as ever - what do you know about what was agreed - even the club said top six on the OS.
The chairman said otherwise yesterday. But like I said, we'll all believe who we choose to believe.