DINKYDALTON said:
bluemoon05 said:
Can someone give me a summary of the last 21 pages?
As per usual the Hughes huggers have no real point and can't answer a direct question with anything approaching reason. So after the usual insults questioning peoples sanity and intelligence against there's, we respond, Then they go bleating to the moderators, seriously, its a trait on this forum and a *ucking joke.
They have nothing. They merely parrot one another. It doesn't matter if the issue of stability has been shown to be a logical fallacy, they still repeat it Little Red Book style. The entire matter can be summed up:
They believe Hughes is the man because they believe Hughes is the man because they believe Hughes is the man after four years of club managment and the March 2007 Barclaycard manager of the month award. Trust
their judgment.
Mourinho is the man because he has 18 years in club management and a trophy cabinet full of good things, having worked with some of the best players and managers (e.g. Van Gaal) in the game. Trust
objective evidence.
As OB1 said: "Jose Mourinho is arguably one of the top five managers in the world: Mark Hughes is inarguably not even in top twenty" (I'd make it top fifty).