£92 for Chelsea? WhoaStill lots of availability for all games bar yesterdays sales.
Pricing:
Ipswich, Brentford, Fulham, So'ton, Forest, Leicester £51-68
West ham, Brighton, Palace, Wolves £61-78
Spurs, Everton, Newcastle, Villa, Bournemount £71-88
Chelsea £75-92
That pricing is insane. Is it any wonder so many people have packed it in.Still lots of availability for all games bar yesterdays sales.
Pricing:
Ipswich, Brentford, Fulham, So'ton, Forest, Leicester £51-68
West ham, Brighton, Palace, Wolves £61-78
Spurs, Everton, Newcastle, Villa, Bournemount £71-88
Chelsea £75-92
Is that before the membership discount?Still lots of availability for all games bar yesterdays sales.
Pricing:
Ipswich, Brentford, Fulham, So'ton, Forest, Leicester £51-68
West ham, Brighton, Palace, Wolves £61-78
Spurs, Everton, Newcastle, Villa, Bournemount £71-88
Chelsea £75-92
I don't think it's unreasonable to suggest that this is clearly an attempt to see if they get away with it, which they will, and it will open up more changes.I just can't understand how difficult it was to put like 2 or 3 games attendance criteria it would probably half the queue if not more
How about the 3,000 pts I have why the feck dont they count my Loyalty.I just can't understand how difficult it was to put like 2 or 3 games attendance criteria it would probably half the queue if not more
I get that but there is the argument that they want a different age group crowd to be able to attend hence the recent attendance criteria, but surely cannot put all games free for all we have a big fan base now i suspected something like this will happen when I saw the criteria. I guess their strategy is to expand the fan base but they already did that it is time to tighten the criteriaHow about the 3,000 pts I have why the feck dont they count my Loyalty.
If it's full of touts who similarly bought tickets for all games last season and sold them on second hand sites it wouldn't make a difference as they have that history. At this stage I think the only way to make sure it's actual blues getting in is ordering by oldest purchase date, but you're then purposefully omitting Johnny come lateleys so no chance they'll ever do that.I just can't understand how difficult it was to put like 2 or 3 games attendance criteria it would probably half the queue if not more
What it does show is a huge demand and we will have no problem selling out 62,000 when the new stand opens. I have sympathy for those scrambling for tickets and am lucky enough to have a season ticket. For those who can be more flexible then the ticket exchange is a good option. Friends and family members used this last season and apart from the biggest matches there were always last minute tickets available.I don't think it's unreasonable to suggest that this is clearly an attempt to see if they get away with it, which they will, and it will open up more changes.
The ticket exchange is a scramble - I need three in a row to take the kids when the release of two together is like hen's teeth.What it does show is a huge demand and we will have no problem selling out 62,000 when the new stand opens. I have sympathy for those scrambling for tickets and am lucky enough to have a season ticket. For those who can be more flexible then the ticket exchange is a good option. Friends and family members used this last season and apart from the biggest matches there were always last minute tickets available.
Problem with that is we've got loads of fans who've been going since the fifties, sixties and seventies. If we went off earliest purchase date no one under 65 would ever get in and that would cause another set of issues.If it's full of touts who similarly bought tickets for all games last season and sold them on second hand sites it wouldn't make a difference as they have that history. At this stage I think the only way to make sure it's actual blues getting in is ordering by oldest purchase date, but you're then purposefully omitting Johnny come lateleys so no chance they'll ever do that.
Is that before the membership discount?