Ireland Leaving - Absolute Disaster

No player is bigger than the team and our results when he hasn't played have been much better. Robinho was a far better player but we showed him the door (Or he found it) don't see why Ireland should be any different. If he really was City through and through he would be getting his head down and battling to be part of one of (hopefully) the most successful periods of our history.

Don't get me wrong, I loved him last season and he deserves the chance to fight but Mancini has no bias I can see, the best players are being picked for the team. Regardless of what some on here think.
 
I can't be bothered trawling through nearly 50 bloody pages, but I'd imagine my opinion has probably already been expressed on here. Namely, the club is bigger than any one player. A disaster? Hardly. People were saying the same thing about Elano and Robinho leaving; we're not doing too badly without them. The same would apply to Stevie.
 
Sorry Pigeonho, but I completely disgaree with everything that you've put in that post.

Pigeonho said:
No, thats impossible. The only time we will have overtaken them, (think of what that word means), is when we win god knows whatever it is they have won since 1992. Until then all we can do is try to compete with them.

You know what he was getting at there. Overtaken as in overtake their position within the league. Besides, when did the Premiership become the sole arbiter of success? Football did exist before 1992.

As it stands united have not officially overtaken Liverpool as yet, league championship-wise anyway, however that looks like it will change cum May, a project which has taken Taggart 20 odd years to achieve. For us to overtake united they have to go to the depths of the 3rd tier, we have to win all the trophies they win, and better it. The truth is that in our lifetime we will not overtake them, but we can and perhaps will compete with them.

No, they don't have to go to the third tier at all. You sound so much like a rag in the above bit, I'm sure you've been hypnotised by propaganda ;)

We will 'perhaps compete with them'? Are you mad, man?

Every great empire eventually falls. Ask Liverpool, or Rome or something.

You think how long it has taken the dippers to be looked upon as they are today from when they were winning everything. United will never have that demise because the success they have had means they will always win things in future, just like Barca and Real will never really fall from grace in Spain. Yes they might have the odd off couple of seasons and perhaps the odd trophyless one too, but they will never go on a total barron spell which will culminate in them becoming an ordinary club.

And you're basing that off of what entirely?
Barca and Real never fall from grace in Spain because they have the highest levels of income. Even then, they still had heavy challenges from Villareal, Valencia, Deportivo, Alaves, etc. Unfortunately, whilst the challengers had to balance the books, Barca and especially Real just went and spent more cash.
No matter what you think (the proof is in black and white), United DO NOT have the financial muscle to keep up with us.

Also, your rag propaganda bullshit has popped up again. United have never being anything but an ordinary club. The best manager to every step on the pitch, Ferguson, has taken them to a shitload of trophies. Before him they've won next to fuck all. One CL, a couple of LCs and a few leagues. Nothing like the previous 20. I've written about this previously, you should read this.

Competing with united is what we can do, and I think we will soon see a situation where the PL, FA, LC will be fought for between us and united, AND the European cups will be fought for between Barca/Real from Spain, the usual suspects from italy and France and united and City from England. Chelsea's time will soon run out cos they simply don't have the prestige and history that united now have to carry the momentum onwards, just like Blackburns short time ended the way it did in the mid 90's. I reckon by 2016/2017, Chelsea will be another average Joe. Thats what sustained success gets you see, and that is why united will never be overtaken by anyone for many many years but our wealth and vision of the owners suggest we will be competing with them, hopefully more than Chelsea have this last 10 years or so.

Prestige and history get you fuck all in this game, ask Royal Engineers, or Nottingham Forest. It has absolutely no effect on a game, which is why football is so good.

Chelsea will be another average Joe when Ambramovich leaves them in about 20 years. United will be long before that. With a resurgent Arsenal team, Roman spending more money, City's billionaire owner out for blood, Tottenham and Villa upping their game, United do not sit in a good spot. You can talk about historical successes all day long, but the stark reality is that every single person at United would rather be in our position than theirs.
 
TheMightyQuinn said:
allan harper said:
If Ireland go's in the summer it will all kick off on here, dont think to many will give a fuck back in the real world on match day.

That's the beauty of City for me.

I can feel downhearted all week about the lads but as soon as I'm near COMS then my mindset changes, my focus shifts to just the game ahead of us and I can see clearly and lucidly.

Losing Ireland would be a huge loss but we've lost bigger players in the past and at least if we do part with Ireland it'll be mutual and not like years gone by where we had to say 'yes' to any offer that made financial sense.

Thanks for pm on the stadium mate x x
 
masterwig said:
ElanJo said:
Probably because Barry is the only traditional midfielder("all rounder") at the club and the fact we've been playing with 2 upfront

For an all-rounder he creates very little and hardly ever scores. Jack-of-all-trades master of none springs to mind. Utterly pointless when he is playing alongside Zabaleta and De Jong in midfield. Anyway, that's getting off topic a bit. I appreciate what he can bring to a side and he has played alright the last few weeks.

You really don't understand Barry's role do you
 
You can all fuck off with your "he hasn't taken his chance" and "a change will do him good" bollocks quite honestly.

He's one of our prize assets and it would be a tragedy to lose him.

I am telling you all here and now that he will be a superstar when he moves on.

But don't worry, we;ll have our journeymen like Vieira and Zableta.


Didsbury Dave - Are you his agent or something?

I personally rate Ireland and think he should stay BUT why should he be any different to any other player we have at the club? Should we be building a team aroud Micah Richards because he came through the Academy,burst onto the scene and was going to be the England right back for the next 15 years 4 years ago NO we shouldn't and we didn't, it is a team game and if an individuals abilities do not fit into the team then they shouldn't play in the team.

While I agree wholeheartedly that he was player of the year, his performances from late January last year started to tail off and his reputation got him through the end of the season. The system we play now unfortunately doesn't suit him. With Bellamy, Tevez/Adebayor/Santa Cruz, Johnson/SWP I just do not see where he fits in. I certainly wouldn't play him before De Jong Barry or Vieira in the central midfield that has 3 very attack minded "forward" players.

Like Elano before him he has to knuckle down and bide his time and take his chance.
 
Esteban de la Sexface said:
He'd probably be better off going to United actually, as much as it pains me to say it.

Ferguson has a history of managing problem players, and getting the best out of them, he'd fit better into their system. A ready made replacement for Scholes. Fucking hell anyway.

We're just going to throw money at it until something sticks.

It's up to Mancini to manage his players. Hopefully he can manage to get a player of Stevies potential , happy and playing, like Hughes did for 12 months

A ready made replacement for Scholes?

Is that the same Scholes that is on the rags bench most weeks?

The same Scholes who can't displace Fletcher, Carrick and Park?

Yeah, you're right. He'd improve that bench no end!
 
Danamy said:
Damocles said:
This was while he was injured last time, so before. The idea was that Hughes wanted to get him out of a 'party city' so that he could concentrate on his football for a bit.

A move to a City full of pissed up sailors......good thinking!! lol


You've obviously never lived down that way. It's a crap night out. Somehow i can't see MJ treading the sticky carpet with a load of matelots at Joannas. Makes 42nd street look like Bredbury Hall!
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.