Danamy
Well-Known Member
tolmie's hairdoo said:It's absolutely insulting to our owner and Khaldoon to suggest Mancini takes the credit for the progress which this club had made in four seasons.
I wonder what his Highness thinks when he now sees people jumping to Mancini's defence, how he has earned the right to remain in the job.
Sheikh Mansour and Khaldoon have earned the right to call the shots as they see fit.
The correlation between our trophies in down to one man. They backed Mancini to the hilt in the market, and appointed him, knowing he could take us to the nest level.
There is a lack of conviction and motivation in our team, and that only comes from a manager who can man-manage all players.
It's Mancini's biggest fault and it will cost him his job one day.
All this talk about a closeness of a relationship between Khaldoon and Mancini will count for zero.
Khaldoon used to have dinner with Hughes and his wife at his home all the time, didn't stop him recognising the time to move on.
The sentence in bold says it all for me
The latest episode being Lescott, another player being frozen out with the cold shoulder treatment without any explanation, is that man management?
I could go on with a list but I'm sure you know the ones that have had the same as above, yet the blue eyed Balo gets untold chances until he can't justify his slack anymore.
In any walk of life if your given the right man management you should be motivated correctly, it's a big part of Mancini's job which he continues to get wrong and it'll eventually cost him.