Isco

leewill31 said:
Uber Blue said:
robbieh said:
We have signed two players who will complement our side. They are however not Grade 1 players like Kun, Silva, Yaya, Tevez and Kompany.

IMO it's not about signing Grade 1 players, it's about signing players that will make City a Grade 1 team.

i know a lot on here didnt think we would win the title with Barry in the team the rest is history :)

I just find it bizarre that somebody thinks Navas and Fernandinho are somehow inferior players. All this because the people who run City don't think it's best policy to pay over and above want they think to be a good and fair price.

We sign Isco great; if we don't I'll get over it and look forward to seeing who else comes in, happy in the knowledge that we have already signed two belting players who are going to improve us.
 
lost_n_spaced said:
For the record, and so we're clear, I don't claim to be an ITK and so care very little (other than for the fact that I'd really like us to sign him) about whether THE INFORMATION POSTED ON ANOTHER FORUM BY ANOTHER POSTER is correct or not.

Feel free to hold me in lower regard if Isco isn't a City player by this evening / goes to Real.

:D
Cheers
 
blumoon said:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5udfDWGeuWc[/youtube]
Anyone heard that massive boat has sank... Titanic or something it's called.



sorry
 
I think we shouldn't be getting too carried away with the effect of the RVPussy signing. Utd won the title with 89pts; same as we (and they) had the previous season. Difference was that our top striker was out and/or not at his absolute best for much of last season.
If you factor in the effect that evidently some players just didn't seem to get on with Mancini, then I would expect an improvement pointswise simply by the appointment of Pellegrini, regardless of signings.
If Nasri doesn't pull out of the wall in the derby, we grab a stuffy goal away to QPR and win our last game at home to Norwich, then it's a 3 point gap. Doesn't need massive changes. Chelsea need to be watched though.
 
M24 Citizen said:
Ray78 said:
lost_n_spaced said:
For the record, and so we're clear, I don't claim to be an ITK and so care very little (other than for the fact that I'd really like us to sign him) about whether THE INFORMATION POSTED ON ANOTHER FORUM BY ANOTHER POSTER is correct or not.

Feel free to hold me in lower regard if Isco isn't a City player by this evening / goes to Real.

:D

I can confirm that as well :).

I have no idea what he's trying to say?

me neither
 
fallowfield said:
You think its good stuff when someone bashing fellow city fans for their emotions? Because thats excatly what we are dealing with, strong emotions, it just show how much ppl invest in their club and im not talking about money but feelings/emotions,time. If someone think fans in here just write things for the fun of it then they are way off track. its the emotions that take control in this kind of situations. some are better to keep them to themselves than others we are all different.

So please dont make fun of other city fans for express themselves.
 
ped said:
dannyburns4 said:
ped said:
no body has cocked up ,it looks like he had a choice between madrid and city ,he chose real,why does there have to be a scapegoat,i f****ing dispare
He hasn't chosen anyone yet other ways it would be all over ssn and the likes
my mistake,your correct,its just annoying,that 1 or 2 posters are talking of cock ups and f***k ups ,when we all know f.a


As I say IMO it is obvious the manager wanted ISCO and that deal was done ages ago - The people negotiating should have got the deal done before the U21s. Unless you are ITK how do you know we haven't c*cked up
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.