NipHolmes
Well-Known Member
roy.or.r said:I am a bit disappointed to say this but we haven't won anything. We signed two players where no other parties were interested and we lost out on those two where other parties are involved.Plain Speaking said:I dont think he is questioning our owners committment and funding but the decision not to match what RM were offering?NipHolmes said:Do you honestly think money is a problem?
A guy who's spent a billion on City on and off field and just bought NYCFC ffs. Biggest wage bill in EPL, best squad in EPL. Jesus Christ. We can't pay buyout on him because it will scupper other deals. Imagine you're at an auction, you want 3 items and they cost say 90 which is 30 each. If you spend 40 on one it means you can't buy the other two and will sacrifice another item. It's that simple we have a plan, we stick to it, it's for the best. Sick of these narrowminded comments. Common sense dictates we are adhering to FFP and we have tailored our plans around it. Stick and no twist.
Isco is a special talent and we were in a unique situation.
It appears our team thought they could get him for less, due to the close relationship with Isco and Pelligrini.
This was a calculated risk that appears to have backfired?
A pity but we cant win them all!
Fernandinho, Yaya and Silva in a midfield three is second only to Barca. Navas will be a get out of jail free card in many games. That pace in games where opponents are tired, bring him on with 20 mins to go and he'd decide many a game and that's as a sub. Quote me on this. I will look even better in a few months haha.