Back on topic Savid Javi this morning has decided the party have no case to answer
Firstly as he is a muslim and home secretary, this proves tories don't hate muslims.
Secondly he doesn't recognise the BCM as representing muslims in general.
Great arguement there savid.
So these instances that were in the letter sent(listed below) can be ignored because you don't acknowledge the group that raised them.
5 April: Mike Payne, who shared an article which called Muslims ‘parasites’ who ‘live off the state and breed like rabbits’.
17 April: Alexander van Terheyden, who called Islam a ‘violent political ideology’ comparable to fascism and communism.
20 April: Darren Harrison, who was alleged to have links to Generation Identity, an anti-Islam organisation with strong links to far-right groups across Europe.
24 April: Phillipa Auton, who retweeted a tweet from Tommy Robinson and tweeted
‘Revoke Muslim immigration, repatriate and secure European borders..’ as a means of keeping Europe safe.
25 April: Peter Lucey who liked a page by right-wing extremist Tommy Robinson and Geert Wilders, the anti-Muslim Dutch politician, and made a number of posts about Islam and the English Defence League.
27 April: Nick Sundin, who tweeted the ‘Prophet Mohammed was a ‘f****** paedophile’
1 May: Karen Sunderland, who called Islam ‘the new Nazism’.
1 May: David Boston posted a picture of bacon hanging on a door handle as a way to 'protect your
house from terrorism'.
23 May: Stephen Goldsack had formerly been the “Scottish security adviser” for the BNP in 2001, which led to the Muslim Council of Scotland accusing the Conservative Party of a “deep probmem of racism and islamaphobia"
This is what they want addressing I cannot see why this should be brushed off by the home secretary.
Every poster must agree these are distastefull and some of them are very offensive comments/actions
Okay, as has been done with the likes of Livingston, Shah and Abbott in the past, i'll break down each comment as I find it, with the overlying understanding that these are considered as examples of racism by the Muslim Council of Britain.
Mike Payne: Unforgivable, hope he was fired and no longer an MP, for any party.
Terheyden: Opinion, he's being critical of Islam the religion, not Muslims in general. People have compared Tories to Fascists. Not racism to me.
Harrison: Alleged is the key word there, and again being against Islam does not mean racism.
Auton: Sounds rather nationalistic, genuine twattish comment, deserves scorn.
Lucey: again, being against Islam does not constitute racism. It seems like the Muslim Council of Britain is against people being critical of their religion, rather than outing instances of racism, which again, without context, this isn't.
Sundin: Critical opinion, hard to argue against. Ties in to ridiculing the religion we discussed earlier. Not an example of racism like the MCB is claiming.
Sunderland: Critical opinion again, not racism.
Boston: Insensitive, prejudiced and insulting. Could be argued as being racist, absolutely.
Goldsack: Probably cause for concern, definitely.
In truth a number of those instances can be ignored because they are critical of the religion, not making assumptions or demonising Muslims in general. The MCB does not like people insulting their religion, well suck it up, buttercup. Christians and Jews have to deal with it all the time. It's when you start saying that Muslims have no right to be here, have no right to believe what they want to believe, should have their beliefs suppressed or are in some way tarnished for doing so and should be treated differently, that's when you enter in the same criticisms the Jewish Labour groups had about the Labour Party recently.