Don't misunderstand me. I rate him highly and every top squad has at least one player like him. I also rated Park in his prime for the same reasons. If we do persist with a 3-5-2 for certain matches, I can easily see him slotting in at right wing back when needed, not to disparage Richards or Zabaleta.<br /><br />-- Mon Aug 06, 2012 9:46 am --<br /><br />NipHolmes said:taconinja said:Use him as the squad utility player he's destined to be? I mean he's basically the English version of Park Ji-Sung.lmjones1uk said:Hmm well I'm yet to be convinced about Chelsea, a lot of players need to climatise also they lost there best striker in Drogba so I think they will get top 4 but will prob be inconsistent.
ManU havnt strengthened in the right areas as yet, Scholes can't play every game and Rooney had a phenomenal season last year, I don't think he will keep that form up especially after a euros. Also I credit Fergie getting 20% more out of his players on purely motivating them to beat us, we broke their spirit last season so I don't think it will be the case again.
I take your point about Midfield, maybe DDR is the answer - what we gonna do with Milner though?
I rate him higher than Park, at £18mill + Ireland I think we were robbed but he's still a better player than often credited for. As a winger he lacks pace but it would be good to see him on the right wing with Johnson on the left as a 442 set of wingers. Balls whipped in on stronger foot like. Through the middle is a place we could play him, box to box as his stamina would allow it. Only problem with Milner is that he is so flexible he has many different roles rather than perfecting a single role he is good at many. I wouldn't consider him a top 4 player though, squad yeah but not starting.
At this point I think people are making a bigger deal of this than need be. I frequently hear of Barcelona as a side of "dwarfs" by British broadcasters. I don't feel they're trying to insult Barcelona either when they say it.NipHolmes said:Invisible_Goat said:Mancio said:unfortunally we are not barcelona , and premier league is not la liga.
then you can go to recall wich forwards mancini signed in all his career and you'll find that but aguero they were all at least 6 feet
In some sports, you know by someone's appearance if they would be half decent, so the fact you call them dwarfs suggest you must be a basketball or American rugby fan.
In football, a weak overweight slow dwarf, could in fact be in the top 50 players in the world because he could have many other great attributes. The fact that Aguero and Tevez are small has no relevance what so ever to how good they are because In terms of ability these men are massive. I would only replace Aguero or Tevez with Messi and he's smaller than both.
How tall was Maradona?
Being small is a good thing as normally players are quicker in accelration and tend to have far superior ball control than taller players.
Unless we have suddenly reverted to Stokes style of play I see no problem with having short players.