richards30
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 May 2009
- Messages
- 27,921
Agreed mate, Caicedo in would mean no winger required
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
It's Quiet 18 - Wanna ring the bell?
- Thread starter tolmie's hairdoo
- Start date
Agreed mate, Caicedo in would mean no winger required
Not entirely sure quoting 2 years left on his contract does anything to your argument and stating your price is completely meaningless.
He's a really skilled player, particularly in progressive carries, dribbles, 1vs1 and he'd also improve under Pep. Considering Brighton's usual transfer stances, 50m would be on the cheaper side.
Stating 'my' price is as meaningless as you stating your price. And of course 2 years left matters, particularly in the context of everything else I said. I am willing to fucking bet we don't sign Mitoma for 50m, that's how strongly I feel about that overblown sudden desperation for a new signing. He would be a decent addition to the team, just in case it reads like I am shitting on the player. I am not. I am shitting on the mooted price.
No way would we spunk 100m plus on Caicedo unless we value Palmer at 40m and he goes in exchangeAgreed mate, Caicedo in would mean no winger required
100m on Caicedo, let Palmer go other way, get a top winger like Leao or Kvara next year. As good as Mitoma is we can definitely get best of the best on market next summerNo way would we spunk 100m plus on Caicedo unless we value Palmer at 40m and he goes in exchange
How much for Caicedo and Enciso?100m on Caicedo, let Palmer go other way, get a top winger like Leao or Kvara next year. As good as Mitoma is we can definitely get best of the best on market next summer
Are Brighton needing a keeper? Is Steffen still in the house?
Palmer 40m, Steffan 15m sweetners
balotelli's back pocket
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Jan 2016
- Messages
- 8,664
Enciso isn't even a winger. He's a 10/second striker, and that's where he's played the majority of his football. So I'm not sure why we would sign him when we already have Alvarez who is a far better player and still can't quite fit into the current system.
I would not call Grealish a winger in any way, and Enciso like Alvarez could play anywhere across the front and even No10Enciso isn't even a winger. He's a 10/second striker, and that's where he's played the majority of his football. So I'm not sure why we would sign him when we already have Alvarez who is a far better player and still can't quite fit into the current system.
balotelli's back pocket
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Jan 2016
- Messages
- 8,664
Well that's silly, seeing as Grealish has been playing as a winger for his entire career.I would not call Grealish a winger in any way, and Enciso like Alvarez could play anywhere across the front and even No10
Also, Alvarez has never played on the wing for us either, so not sure Pep agrees that he can play 'anywhere across the front'.
I doubt De Zerbi would accept Steffen as a backup when Pep couldn’t hahaHow much for Caicedo and Enciso?
Are Brighton needing a keeper? Is Steffen still in the house?
Palmer 40m, Steffan 15m sweetners
Grealish is a great wide player, but he not what I would describe as a wingerWell that's silly, seeing as Grealish has been playing as a winger for his entire career.
Also, Alvarez has never played on the wing for us either, so not sure Pep agrees that he can play 'anywhere across the front'.