It's Quiet 18 - Wanna ring the bell?

[Matt Diablo]

Well he was fukin wrong

 

[Matt Diablo]

What was the Grealish thing he mentioned months ago? Nothing happened…

Shit happens. Lots of variables. Lots of layers. Catch up

 

[Gabriel]

Well he was fukin wrong

The player that was presumably earmarked to replace Alvarez was Bobb, but he was injured only days after Alvarez left, and then rather than seek another alternative we decided to make do and mend.

 

[John Wayne]

All going to plan then. If the rebuild is planned for 2025 then that's only 33 days away.

 

[argyle]

Why do people still hang on every word, trying to decipher something that’s nonsense. He’s covered himself - we don’t sign anyone then it was for the tears. We sign someone and it was to mop up jizz.

Pathetic.

Why do people, who haven't been on here long, post things like this whenever Tolmie gives a hint?

 

[City64!]

Why do people, who haven't been on here long, post things like this whenever Tolmie gives a hint?

Not sure if you’re able to see the previous posts, but I’ve already explained.

Or are you saying people can’t question him and that it?

So weird that a few posters are implying you’re not able to question a poster, especially after the last few bits of knowledge have been incorrect.

The proofs in the pudding - if he was correct how could I, or anyone, question him.

 

[Dazzle84]

It isn't. Even the top players do struggle initally to really settle after a big move. With Sergio it was a little hit and miss during his earlier years and he did join earlier on in the season.

Sergio hit and miss? 23 goals in his first season. Including one of the most famous goals of all time?

 

[Roachy]

Sergio hit and miss? 23 goals in his first season. Including one of the most famous goals of all time?

2 on his debut as well.

 

[mcfcphil]

Not sure if you’re able to see the previous posts, but I’ve already explained.

Or are you saying people can’t question him and that it?

So weird that a few posters are implying you’re not able to question a poster, especially after the last few bits of knowledge have been incorrect.

The proofs in the pudding - if he was correct how could I, or anyone, question him.

I think it’s just a bit of fun on a transfer forum tbh.

If Tolmie gets something wrong/right, well, c’est la vie.

feeling the need to “question” him seems a little serious.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Not sure if you’re able to see the previous posts, but I’ve already explained.

Or are you saying people can’t question him and that it?

So weird that a few posters are implying you’re not able to question a poster, especially after the last few bits of knowledge have been incorrect.

The proofs in the pudding - if he was correct how could I, or anyone, question him.

Might help if you think of him like a Mystic Meg rather than a Martin Lewis.