He looks older. Close to retirement older!Must admit, I thought Kovacic was older than 29.
He looks older. Close to retirement older!Must admit, I thought Kovacic was older than 29.
City, like in the past, pounces on bargains if they see it. Kovacic for 30 ish mil is a bargain in todays market.
Kovacic isn't even better than James Maddison IMO.Kovacic isn’t as good as Rice or Bellingham is he?
Hope we’re not worried about ffp and going for the cheap midfield option. Things are cheaper for a reason.
City are pretty much dominating this league, with the best manager in the world, and will be favourites again for every trophy next season too. We’re a hell of a draw for any player, why aren’t we after the very best available?
That's just not true, haha! For squad depth in the level of quality Kovacic is, its a massive bargain.No point buying a bargain if it’s not even as good as what you already have. Kovacic is an Aston Villa level signing.
Yeah, Kovacic, Guerreiro and Gvardiol won't take that much time to finish once the final is done... Anyone bigger than that would take time though, but that depends on sales.
He looks older. Close to retirement older!
I do think City already know Laporte wants to go and wont wait around for him to leave first.Depends on who is leaving and when. No way we sign Gvardiol, before a CB leaves. If it is Laporte leaving, depends on how long till a deal foelr him is agreed.
We’re after the players we want to be after. Our record shows we’re usually right. Who else was after Gundogan, or Bernardo, when we bought them, they weren’t the big shiny names then. For what we want he’s better than Rice, and is better than Bellingham now, maybe not better than Bellingham will be.Kovacic isn’t as good as Rice or Bellingham is he?
Hope we’re not worried about ffp and going for the cheap midfield option. Things are cheaper for a reason.
City are pretty much dominating this league, with the best manager in the world, and will be favourites again for every trophy next season too. We’re a hell of a draw for any player, why aren’t we after the very best available?
I assume you said similar about Aké, Akanji etc.?
Signing a Croatian in time for the Champions League final, smart
Not even remotely the same type of playerKovacic isn't even better than James Maddison IMO.
If we're talking about Pep coaching up a player with untapped potential then we should be going for Maddison who would potentially be cheaper and is much younger. Maddison has had multiple good performances vs City with far less quality around him than Kovacic.
Don’t think ffp will be a problem with the potential money we will bring in if we win what’s left. Plus big outgoings in terms of Bernardo, Laporte and cancelo. Also including loan players and academy players who we can get a large chunk of money from.Kovacic isn’t as good as Rice or Bellingham is he?
Hope we’re not worried about ffp and going for the cheap midfield option. Things are cheaper for a reason.
City are pretty much dominating this league, with the best manager in the world, and will be favourites again for every trophy next season too. We’re a hell of a draw for any player, why aren’t we after the very best available?
If Bellingham now wants Real firstly and Rice is 100-120m, City are doing the right thing going for Kovacic for 30mil if they have no idea if Bernardo or Gundo goes. its a solid move.There weren’t really world class players in their position available then though, but now there is Rice and Bellingham yet we’re after Kovacic. Not really improving the team that. If Gundogan or Bernie leave it’d be weaker, Kovacic isn’t as good as either.
I'll start by saying I've admittedly become more spoiled than I could have ever imagined in regard to City's success and their signings but singing Kovacic would be extremely underwhelming.
I can't recall him ever having a standout performance versus City through all the years he's been at Chelsea. Even in the CL final, it was Mount and Kante running the show through the middle. I trust Pep and the board as they hit on their signing more than they don't but this feels a lot like the Kalvin Phillips signing to me. Not to mention it's just another senior player in the middle that Foden would have to compete with. Although it's probably time I stop fantasizing about Foden ever playing centrally under Pep as it would have happened by now if it were in his plans.
1) I'm not sure Maddison actually would be any cheaperKovacic isn't even better than James Maddison IMO.
If we're talking about Pep coaching up a player with untapped potential then we should be going for Maddison who would potentially be cheaper and is much younger. Maddison has had multiple good performances vs City with far less quality around him than Kovacic.
They play in 2 separate positions, Maddison wouldn't get a game the way we are currently playing. He's not displacing Kev or Alvarez, and Foden will be far superior in that position given chance. Kovacic is a likely Philips replacement.Kovacic isn't even better than James Maddison IMO.
If we're talking about Pep coaching up a player with untapped potential then we should be going for Maddison who would potentially be cheaper and is much younger. Maddison has had multiple good performances vs City with far less quality around him than Kovacic.