Having a top class striker available 20% of the time is better than 0% in my opinion.
Again, people dreaming about a player who doesn't exist any more.
Having a top class striker available 20% of the time is better than 0% in my opinion.
If we wnat the ebst then at some point we will have to pay over the odds.Not happening at this stage now in my opinion. Appreciate some people may have some knowledge of it but It would seem far to big a deal to not be well advanced now.
Long run, think its best we stick to our usual and dont pay what we see as over inflated prices. We are still more than capable of winning the league as we stand.
well, we don't know for sure till next week but if we don't get someone in then the strategy has gone wrong. Levy will come out of this smelling of roses and questions should be asked about why we were going after Kane with 3 years left on his contract with offers that were too low. If you want a world class player with 3 years left on his contract then you need to pay the money. I don't know what our final offer was but we obviously didn't go in high enough.5 days to get a striker now, this is an unbelievable fuck up if we don't have a back up. We need to push on and improve, if anything the Grealish signing looks like a foolish one now as we needed a striker more than anything.
I'd just ignore him.
You posted yesterday essentially saying City were putting in their final bid and they expect it to be enough.
That clearly is ITK as City obviously submitted their final bid, but it wasn't enough. Don't really know what more people want from an ITK?
It's as if they've not watched him or City over the last 2yrsAgain, people dreaming about a player who doesn't exist any more.
If you're going to defend yourself, you may as well have the courtesy to do it in video form ;)Exposed how?
Two days ago City deliver a best and final and this saga ends today?
How about Kane and Grealish being the actual targets?
When asked for an opinion, I give it, when I have info to give, I give it.
Even in my last post as the news was breaking, I stated if the briefs were legit, it was probably because City had pulled the plug or not getting near the valuation, Spurs needed to publicly repair the damage done?
It isn't. You're taking up a squad place for no reason that could go to someone who can actually play and in the off chance he's available for a big game the squad is used to playing without him.Having a top class striker available 20% of the time is better than 0% in my opinion.