John Terry [Merged]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

I don't hate spud321 in fact I don't hate spuds fans in general, might hate the fuckwit element of spurs fans but like all clubs most are decent and you can have banter with. No doubt a lot of other clubs think the same of us.
 
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

Rammyblues said:
I don't hate spud321 in fact I don't hate spuds fans in general, might hate the fuckwit element of spurs fans but like all clubs most are decent and you can have banter with. No doubt a lot of other clubs think the same of us.

Aye, my old form teacher is a Spuds fan. We had decent banter when talking about football.
 
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

Rammyblues said:
I don't hate spud321 in fact I don't hate spuds fans in general, might hate the fuckwit element of spurs fans but like all clubs most are decent and you can have banter with. No doubt a lot of other clubs think the same of us.

Spurs fans are weird, as individuals they're usually a good laugh but as a group they're irritating. Maybe it's something to do with our recent record against them.
 
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

spursmad321 said:
kippaxwarrior said:
spursmad321 said:
Well I am with Fixer on this one, I think JT will join Man City, and I have backed my judgement on this with a £50 pound bet at 10/1 with skybet.

I must stress this is my opinion and not info that I have received.

how did you get 10/1?
he was 5/2 and today 13/8

I put the bet on before I let the cat out of the bag. *wink*

could you expand?
 
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

My brother is a spurs fan...and I got to say he is one of the most annoying people ive ever seen...yid Tw@t
 
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

The Europe-fixated media never seem to pick up on this fact, but there is a perverse advantage to be playing for domestic trophies only this season. If we bring in everyone that we want to bring in, we will have a large and extremely talented squad excluded who are excluded from Europe by default and for one season only. What I mean is, we will have great players, a great team and a great squad and I'm sure we'll seek to take advantage of the fact that we will be fresher than most by the end of the season because our rivals will have so many more playing commitments than us and it's bound to tell to some extent or other. This is the sort of thing that our half-witted media will pick up on but only when it becomes impossible to miss. You won't hear the first media mention of this in April, probably, but City will have been thinking about it for a much longer time than that.
 
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

Pam said:
The Europe-fixated media never seem to pick up on this fact, but there is a perverse advantage to be playing for domestic trophies only this season. If we bring in everyone that we want to bring in, we will have a large and extremely talented squad excluded who are excluded from Europe by default and for one season only. What I mean is, we will have great players, a great team and a great squad and I'm sure we'll seek to take advantage of the fact that we will be fresher than most by the end of the season because our rivals will have so many more playing commitments than us and it's bound to tell to some extent or other. This is the sort of thing that our half-witted media will pick up on but only when it becomes impossible to miss. You won't hear the first media mention of this in April, probably, but City will have been thinking about it for a much longer time than that.


ive been saying this for weeks if you look at all the pros to this it does make a lot of sense even though we are not in europe.
 
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

Superman_7 said:
My brother is a spurs fan...and I got to say he is one of the most annoying people ive ever seen...yid Tw@t


if your brother is a yid what does that make you? or are we just referring to spurs fans as a whole
 
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

There is a spud mashing thread elsewhere on these boards.
 
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

MCFC_Freestyler said:
Spursmad321

I'm not being rude or ignorant mate, but why come on a city forum feeding us all this information, even if you are ITK and everything you say is correct (which i don't doubt at all and atm i am 100% on your posts and in you i trust), but why do it? city fans and spurs fans pretty much don't get on and the majority of city fans i know hate spurs, if i had info on some other club i wouldn't join their forum and tell them about it, it's not a dig at you i just wanna know why you chose to do it?

I hope this post doesn't come across all agressive, as it isn't meant to, just asking a questions, also thanks for your interesting posts!

cheers :D

An interesting question which is quite easy to answer, I don't hate City fans or any other clubs fans either. I hate losing and when we do I am not one to be around for the next couple of hours, but that doesn't mean I hate the surpporters of the other team we lost to. I would hate someone who raped my daughter or killed my mum, but to hate someone for beating us in a football match is a bit strong imho.

I come on here because I am fortunate enough to get some good info on your club which I thought you would like to know, and if by doing so I can turn some city fans from hateing us then I would have achieved something good.

I hope this answers your question.

Cheers

Spursmad321
 
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

would love him to sign but just can't see it - Terry likes to be the big cheese at chelsea and I think this is likely to be posturing on his part such that ancelotti when he comes in will give him a big cuddle and tell him how important he is to him as his long term captain, and Terry will then come out with "never wanted to leave, new manager has reassured me of captaincy and I am not and never was going anywhere" - just an opinion, life goes on
 
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

The Europe-fixated media never seem to pick up on this fact, but there is a perverse advantage to be playing for domestic trophies only this season. If we bring in everyone that we want to bring in, we will have a large and extremely talented squad excluded who are excluded from Europe by default and for one season only. What I mean is, we will have great players, a great team and a great squad and I'm sure we'll seek to take advantage of the fact that we will be fresher than most by the end of the season because our rivals will have so many more playing commitments than us and it's bound to tell to some extent or other. This is the sort of thing that our half-witted media will pick up on but only when it becomes impossible to miss. You won't hear the first media mention of this in April, probably, but City will have been thinking about it for a much longer time than that.

Tccchhhhhhhhhhhhhh, and I thought it was all down to MHs boot camp getting the players super fit. Pam I agree at most with two cup runs going to the final in each one we will only play max 50 games. If we were in Europa it would be closer to seventy. For that number of games we would need a top quality squad of 30 players, if we get the players linked with this summer we should have a top quality squad of about 25 players and that should be enough to get us Europe next year when a further 5 -6 top notch players can be added, but with the incentive we will be playing in Europe hopefully CL). The other advantage is that by not playing in Europe all the international players who are after World Cup glory won't be as knackered and maybe injury free allowing them a) to get picked for their respective world cup squads and b) have a decent world cup.
 
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

spursmad321 said:
MCFC_Freestyler said:
Spursmad321

I'm not being rude or ignorant mate, but why come on a city forum feeding us all this information, even if you are ITK and everything you say is correct (which i don't doubt at all and atm i am 100% on your posts and in you i trust), but why do it? city fans and spurs fans pretty much don't get on and the majority of city fans i know hate spurs, if i had info on some other club i wouldn't join their forum and tell them about it, it's not a dig at you i just wanna know why you chose to do it?

I hope this post doesn't come across all agressive, as it isn't meant to, just asking a questions, also thanks for your interesting posts!

cheers :D

An interesting question which is quite easy to answer, I don't hate City fans or any other clubs fans either. I hate losing and when we do I am not one to be around for the next couple of hours, but that doesn't mean I hate the surpporters of the other team we lost to. I would hate someone who raped my daughter or killed my mum, but to hate someone for beating us in a football match is a bit strong imho.

I come on here because I am fortunate enough to get some good info on your club which I thought you would like to know, and if by doing so I can turn some city fans from hateing us then I would have achieved something good.

I hope this answers your question.

Cheers

Spursmad321

Ignore the whingers, spursmad, and keep up the good work.
 
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

BringBackSwales said:
would love him to sign but just can't see it - Terry likes to be the big cheese at chelsea and I think this is likely to be posturing on his part such that ancelotti when he comes in will give him a big cuddle and tell him how important he is to him as his long term captain, and Terry will then come out with "never wanted to leave, new manager has reassured me of captaincy and I am not and never was going anywhere" - just an opinion, life goes on


so it's wait for the 09.30 press conference from the bridge then
 
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

Rammyblues said:
The Europe-fixated media never seem to pick up on this fact, but there is a perverse advantage to be playing for domestic trophies only this season. If we bring in everyone that we want to bring in, we will have a large and extremely talented squad excluded who are excluded from Europe by default and for one season only. What I mean is, we will have great players, a great team and a great squad and I'm sure we'll seek to take advantage of the fact that we will be fresher than most by the end of the season because our rivals will have so many more playing commitments than us and it's bound to tell to some extent or other. This is the sort of thing that our half-witted media will pick up on but only when it becomes impossible to miss. You won't hear the first media mention of this in April, probably, but City will have been thinking about it for a much longer time than that.

Tccchhhhhhhhhhhhhh, and I thought it was all down to MHs boot camp getting the players super fit. Pam I agree at most with two cup runs going to the final in each one we will only play max 50 games. If we were in Europa it would be closer to seventy. For that number of games we would need a top quality squad of 30 players, if we get the players linked with this summer we should have a top quality squad of about 25 players and that should be enough to get us Europe next year when a further 5 -6 top notch players can be added, but with the incentive we will be playing in Europe hopefully CL). The other advantage is that by not playing in Europe all the international players who are after World Cup glory won't be as knackered and maybe injury free allowing them a) to get picked for their respective world cup squads and b) have a decent world cup.

I was discussing this with a friend the other week. He was annoyed that we did not get into europe but i think it could be a blessing in disguise. Not competing in europe this season could mean the differnce between the europa leage and the champions league next season.

400th post. a-woo hoo!
 
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

TedLoonBlue said:
BringBackSwales said:
would love him to sign but just can't see it - Terry likes to be the big cheese at chelsea and I think this is likely to be posturing on his part such that ancelotti when he comes in will give him a big cuddle and tell him how important he is to him as his long term captain, and Terry will then come out with "never wanted to leave, new manager has reassured me of captaincy and I am not and never was going anywhere" - just an opinion, life goes on


so it's wait for the 09.30 press conference from the bridge then

Haven't heard about this. Has there been another of Chelski's strange announcements?
 
Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

one way of looking at it aswell is the fact if terry did join us he wouldnt be playing 50+ games next seasonand would be fresher for the world cup.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top