citizen_maine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 May 2011
- Messages
- 13,163
1-0 will do2-1 will do.
Goals scored.
Aplhabetically
1-0 will do2-1 will do.
Goals scored.
It will for Leicester, but not for Tottenham.1-0 will do
Aplhabetically
TraffordIt will for Leicester, but not for Tottenham.
I know it should be, but unfortunately, it isn’t.Trafford
If you're gonna nick a joke from The Fringe then at least tell it properly.I am a trans person who suffers from panic attacks. My pronouns are their, their.
I improved it. The written version is wrong. I used possessive pronouns which is surely correct. Na na-na na na.If you're gonna nick a joke from The Fringe then at least tell it properly.
I’m an extremely emotionally needy non-binary person. My pronouns are “there, there”. Sarah Keyworth
No, the possessive pronoun is wrong as the original joke clearly refers to the use of "there there" by a second person in an emotionally supportive manner. You therefore ruined an already fucking awful joke, well done :)I improved it. The written version is wrong. I used possessive pronouns which is surely correct. Na na-na na na.
As they are homonyms and the joke is verbal does it matter?No, the possessive pronoun is wrong as the original joke clearly refers to the use of "there there" by a second person in an emotionally supportive manner. You therefore ruined an already fucking awful joke, well done :)
if they were homonyms of the same spelling I would tend to agree, but as the spelling differentiates the meaning, then I would not. This applies obviously only as the joke is no longer verbal.As they are homonyms and the joke is verbal does it matter?