Joke thread

[citizen_maine]

2-1 will do.

Goals scored.

1-0 will do
Aplhabetically

 

[Vienna_70]

1-0 will do
Aplhabetically

It will for Leicester, but not for Tottenham.

 

[KS55]

I am a trans person who suffers from panic attacks. My pronouns are their, their.

 

[citizen_maine]

It will for Leicester, but not for Tottenham.

Trafford

 

[Vienna_70]

Trafford

I know it should be, but unfortunately, it isn’t.

 

[1.618034]

I am a trans person who suffers from panic attacks. My pronouns are their, their.

If you're gonna nick a joke from The Fringe then at least tell it properly.


I’m an extremely emotionally needy non-binary person. My pronouns are “there, there”. Sarah Keyworth

 

[KS55]

If you're gonna nick a joke from The Fringe then at least tell it properly.


I’m an extremely emotionally needy non-binary person. My pronouns are “there, there”. Sarah Keyworth

I improved it. The written version is wrong. I used possessive pronouns which is surely correct. Na na-na na na.

 

[flook]

I improved it. The written version is wrong. I used possessive pronouns which is surely correct. Na na-na na na.

No, the possessive pronoun is wrong as the original joke clearly refers to the use of "there there" by a second person in an emotionally supportive manner. You therefore ruined an already fucking awful joke, well done :)

 

[Cityfan]

No, the possessive pronoun is wrong as the original joke clearly refers to the use of "there there" by a second person in an emotionally supportive manner. You therefore ruined an already fucking awful joke, well done :)

As they are homonyms and the joke is verbal does it matter?

 

[flook]

As they are homonyms and the joke is verbal does it matter?

if they were homonyms of the same spelling I would tend to agree, but as the spelling differentiates the meaning, then I would not. This applies obviously only as the joke is no longer verbal.