Keir Starmer

Thats your wish - targeting it at the pensioners in most need who get pension credits and more importantly encouraging as many as possible to make those claims. It may mean that the savings are a percentage of what is hoped but if pensioners are getting all the help they are entitled to then good.

I suspect you fear any successful policy from a Labour Govt.
What about the Pensioners who have a small pension after working all their lives? When I started work in 1975 there was no Pension offered to me working for a PLC. I did subsequently have Pensions but those older than me quite often didn't have company pensions going back to the 60's/70's.

My first pension was when I reached 25 and it was 5% contribution from employer and employee, nothing like the 27% Civil Servants are getting now.

A small pension of around 4K per annum plus state pension gets around £15.5k pa, no pension credit, no WFP, big chunk of income lost especially for those renting properties. You are proper left wing, a Starmer fan boy, he's a middle class **** but you don't give two fucks about the people who have worked hard and are now struggling, however you're quite happy for the lazy cunts to claim maximum benefits.
 
Strange times. It seems like those on the left are moving so much to the right, they are passing those on the right moving left.
 
What I cannot stand abouit him more than anything else is the lying. For me, it's even worse than when Boris would do it. I don't know why I feel like that, maybe it's because I am supporter of conservative principles, but genuinely I have NEVER been a fan of Boris.

I think it's because Starmer is so slimy, I am not even sure he knows he is doing it. The lie about having to remove the WFA to "stablize the economy". I have never heard such tripe in all my life. The economy was not "unstable" in the first place. Broke, yes. But not "unstable".

As if a £1.3bn saving contributing to an alleged forecast £22hn deficit in £1,226bn of overall spending, could POSSIBLY be something that would "stablize the economy". It's such a ludicrous claim it is laughable. Anyone who stops to think, will not believe it, because it's just not true.

He CHOSE to take the WFA away for whatever sick motivation he may have had. That's the truth and his constant lying about it is ruining his image more and more, day by day.
Why would you refer to Johnson as a liar and yet in the same breath call the fat **** ‘Boris’? By that token shouldn’t you be referring to the Prime Minister as Sir Keir, or at least as Keir?

I don’t know why people legitimise Johnson in this way, like he’s their mate, when they refer to every other politician by their surname. It’s utterly bizzare and gives off the impression that they are suggestible, or have even, to some extent, been gaslit.

Genuinely, why do you afford him that gesture of calling him by his first name, when you plainly don’t towards other politicians?
 
Who cares ? It’s not out the taxpayers money. Someone offered his son accommodation and he accepted , non story.
Why can't you accept he's a middle class **** masquerading as a Socialist, he's part of the Primrose Hill mob, he knows fuck all about working class struggles.

 
Strange times. It seems like those on the left are moving so much to the right, they are passing those on the right moving left.
While I agree with the first part of your comment, I'm not sure there are many on the right moving left. At least not on here. It seems most are just keen to jump on the mistakes labour are making.
 
Who cares ? It’s not out the taxpayers money. Someone offered his son accommodation and he accepted , non story.
It will be somebody that wants something in return, and during the Election campaign Starmer wouldnt have been at home much, so the press wouldnt have been parked outside his house
Who cares ? It’s not out the taxpayers money. Someone offered his son accommodation and he accepted , non story.
Whoever it was will want something in return, and Starmer wouldnt have been at home much during the Election campaign, so the press wouldnt have been parked outside his house all the time
 
What about the Pensioners who have a small pension after working all their lives? When I started work in 1975 there was no Pension offered to me working for a PLC. I did subsequently have Pensions but those older than me quite often didn't have company pensions going back to the 60's/70's.

My first pension was when I reached 25 and it was 5% contribution from employer and employee, nothing like the 27% Civil Servants are getting now.

A small pension of around 4K per annum plus state pension gets around £15.5k pa, no pension credit, no WFP, big chunk of income lost especially for those renting properties. You are proper left wing, a Starmer fan boy, he's a middle class **** but you don't give two fucks about the people who have worked hard and are now struggling, however you're quite happy for the lazy cunts to claim maximum benefits.

I currently am living on 2 pensions total accumulated provision is £13.4k. I heat my home and last year paid nigh on a grand in utility bills alone. I run an aged (11 yo 90k mile ) car. I don't get a bus pass I don't get any state pension ( thats been moved a further 5 years away from me ) but I get by well enough. £300 would be a nice to have not a deal breaker.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.