Keir Starmer

He also said what he got on the doorsteps of Hartlepool was that the previously 53% Labour voting public were looking at the lack of funding to the area and noticing that in other areas with Tory mayors and MPs the money was being released to them.

He didn’t blame people for voting how they did, but without calling it bribery, referred to it as pork belly politics. In other words Hartlepool constituents know that the only way they’ll get anything from a Tory government is to have a Tory MP and mayor.

Folk will find the problem with that is there is a finite amount they are prepared to spend on their constituency so in fact despite what they think will happen things will be levelled down as the cake is cut into thinner and thinner slices
 
The left/ labours complete inability to realise why they are in this position is finely demonstrated by some on this forum.
You don’t listen to other people’s opinions or understand why they have them. You just dismiss them as idiots that aren’t as clever as you are.
 
The left/ labours complete inability to realise why they are in this position is finely demonstrated by some on this forum.
You don’t listen to other people’s opinions or understand why they have them. You just dismiss them as idiots that aren’t as clever as you are.
I'm sure most Labour voters are aware that this current version are unelectable.
The problem I have with the current situation is the lack of Tory voters willing to hold their own party accountable for being a pretty poor ruling government.
Not sure there are any winners on the political landscape right now, just a best of the worst scenario.
Not really anything to shout about either way.
 
Yes, national regulators have always been able to approve use of a vaccine in a pandemic, that’s why we were able still to sign off the Pfizer one in December.

Thanks - I never knew that, but it makes sense in emergency situations. I wrongly assumed they had to be approved by EMA and their approval ratified by the EU before they could be used by member states. I could understand how member states could order ahead of EMA approval but then not actually administer them until afterwards.

Every days a school day and all that.
 
Starmer is finished already but any new Labour leader would be fucked immediately upon taking charge.

The various bits of what Labour now comprises of are totally incompatible:

Middle class Left: hugely invested in the Palestian issue, identity politics, BLM, US politics, rubbishing UK history etc.

Hard Left: the Rascalites. Class politics, state control, union involvement etc

Traditional Labour: all but vanished.

It's hard to see how Labour evolves into an election winning force again.
 
Starmer is finished already but any new Labour leader would be fucked immediately upon taking charge.

The various bits of what Labour now comprises of are totally incompatible:

Middle class Left: hugely invested in the Palestian issue, identity politics, BLM, US politics, rubbishing UK history etc.

Hard Left: the Rascalites. Class politics, state control, union involvement etc

Traditional Labour: all but vanished.

It's hard to see how Labour evolves into an election winning force again.


You do know that Israel is the most vaccinated country in the world because it failed to include the Palestinians in the population count ....... or do you just read the Daily Mail / Express ?
 
I think many of Corbyns ideas just went too far, too many free hand outs, voters wwre concerned where the money was going to come from. Which is a bit ironic considering what the current government has had to spend.
This notion of "free hand handouts" needs to be challenged,

Take the case of free broadband.

It was a fantastic idea, would have helped millions, close the productivity gap and more importantly help educate millions of school kids. It would have paid for itself in economic growth.

But as long as the RW think everything should have a monetary value then great idea's will fail and kids will stay under educated, the productivity gap will remain and economic growth will be elusive

The country is still living under the bizarre illusion that running the nations finances is like running a household, it is nonsense, but it is not challenged.
 
I actually said;
Labour will never win as a hard left party and the members won’t let them get back to the middle

No narrative mate
I didn’t say they are hard left, I said they will never win as a hard left
The members didn't want a hard left party, they wanted a Socialist party.
 
You do know that Israel is the most vaccinated country in the world because it failed to include the Palestinians in the population count ....... or do you just read the Daily Mail / Express ?
I don't read the Mail but for what it's worth Israel has offered the vaccine to all its citizens, including the large Arab minority. What they haven’t done is vaccinate Palestinians who don't live in Israel.

You are missing the point, though. Its not an issue that concerns many mainstream voters.
 
This notion of "free hand handouts" needs to be challenged,

Take the case of free broadband.

It was a fantastic idea, would have helped millions, close the productivity gap and more importantly help educate millions of school kids. It would have paid for itself in economic growth.

But as long as the RW think everything should have a monetary value then great idea's will fail and kids will stay under educated, the productivity gap will remain and economic growth will be elusive

The country is still living under the bizarre illusion that running the nations finances is like running a household, it is nonsense, but it is not challenged.
Why is it nonsense? depends how you run your household, If you dont spend more than you earn then its a resonable assumption. If you think credit cards are there to run up large debts which you will deal with at some undertermined time in the future then you wont have any concern over Corbyn style politics.
 
Starmer seems an intelligent bloke but has all the personality and charisma of a plank of wood. Completely uninspiring leader.

I can't stand him but you can't deny Johnson has at least some level of character about him which the electorate obviously love
 
Starmer is finished already but any new Labour leader would be fucked immediately upon taking charge.

The various bits of what Labour now comprises of are totally incompatible:

Middle class Left: hugely invested in the Palestian issue, identity politics, BLM, US politics, rubbishing UK history etc.

Hard Left: the Rascalites. Class politics, state control, union involvement etc

Traditional Labour: all but vanished.

It's hard to see how Labour evolves into an election winning force again.
It doesn't

It should fold or split into parties that represent each faction.

I am traditional Labour btw, i am a Socialist. There is nothing hard left about Socialism, nothing hard left about wanting what is best for the working class, nothing hard left about state interventionism, nothing hard left about union involvement.

I couldnt care less about identity politics, most Socialists don't, they care about class politics, I will rubbish UK history when that history is portrayed wrongly though. The narrative about standing alone in WW2 and other such nonsense is just nationalistic bullshit designed to appeal to flag shagging populists who long for visions of Empire. You can not change history, but you can portray it properly. It is not rubbishing history, it is teaching history correctly on not relying on myth.
 
Starmer seems an intelligent bloke but has all the personality and charisma of a plank of wood. Completely uninspiring leader.

I can't stand him but you can't deny Johnson has at least some level of character about him which the electorate obviously love
It's a shame the character is a poundland Arthur Daly.
 
Should be a box on the ballot paper which says None of the above. Then perhaps the electorate wouldnt be taken for granted.
 
It doesn't

It should fold or split into parties that represent each faction.

I am traditional Labour btw, i am a Socialist. There is nothing hard left about Socialism, nothing hard left about wanting what is best for the working class, nothing hard left about state interventionism, nothing hard left about union involvement.

I couldnt care less about identity politics, most Socialists don't, they care about class politics, I will rubbish UK history when that history is portrayed wrongly though. The narrative about standing alone in WW2 and other such nonsense is just nationalistic bullshit designed to appeal to flag shagging populists who long for visions of Empire. You can not change history, but you can portray it properly. It is not rubbishing history, it is teaching history correctly on not relying on myth.
what do you mean the nonsense about standing alone in ww2? please explain?
 
It's a shame the character is a poundland Arthur Daly.
True enough haha.

Labour will not win elections while the FPTP system is in place. There's one right wing party in this country which everyone right of centre will vote for and unite behind.

The left and centre sadly seem incapable of working together to mutually benefit each other.
 
Why is it nonsense? depends how you run your household, If you dont spend more than you earn then its a resonable assumption. If you think credit cards are there to run up large debts which you will deal with at some undertermined time in the future then you wont have any concern over Corbyn style politics.
Its worked on you then I see.

The country does not have a credit card, it also has assets that far outweigh any debt, we have our own currency so can not go bankrupt.

We have only just recently finished paying off loans from WW1, because countries borrow to invest. If you waited for taxes to be collected before they are spent, like in a household where you cannot spend until you get paid, this country would no longer exist.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top