Keir Starmer

It would pop out if the prosecutor dealing with it escalated it. There’s no evidence that happened and there is evidence that it didn’t.

LOL!!

Starmer: "Any news I need to know about, Prosecutor?"

Prosecutor " No, just some no mark frenchie called Saveel, I'm looking into"

Starmer "Alright. Crack on, then"...

Laughable!
 
Wait, so the nationally known name 'Jimmy Saville' who was attached to the BBC was thought of as "unimportant" to Starmer??

Good fucking lord, you truly are dumber than a bag of rocks with the excuses!!

Keep going! I'm enjoying the incredulous stupidity from you tonight!!
As I said, there was absolutely no evidence it was escalated to him.
You carry on making up your own narrative that contradicts the evidence though as it just confirms your idiocy.
 
I have to admit I haven't got any knowledge how the system would work to be fair. Haven't you got the slightest doubt though?

After all it was the so called establishment that shielded him for years.
I have no reason to disbelieve the investigation described in the link that @dave_blue12 posted, and no one credible has suggested there was a cover up.
 
As I said, there was absolutely no evidence it was escalated to him.
You carry on making up your own narrative that contradicts the evidence though as it just confirms your idiocy.

LOL!!!

So nobody wanted to escalate a *looks at notes* SIR Jimmy Saville in connection to sex crimes.

Nobody...?? Fucking hell!! Who else is fucking defending this nonsense beside you and Dumb Dave??
 
I have to admit I haven't got any knowledge how the system would work to be fair. Haven't you got the slightest doubt though?

After all it was the so called establishment that shielded him for years.

I thought the Saville case was early on in Starmer's time as DPP? From what I've read, he identified problems where these kind of cases wouldn't be flagged up to him, so introduced a system to deal with them. It was only after that, when the case came up again, that it was then flagged by the person he'd brought in to deal with this very issue.
 
As I said, there was absolutely no evidence it was escalated to him.
You carry on making up your own narrative that contradicts the evidence though as it just confirms your idiocy.

Even CCHQ who were prepared to tell all manner of lies had given up on this particular lie in the GE campaign but Bigga, resident BM clown knows better.

You’ve got to laugh.
 
So, is Dumb Dave and WestLife claiming that only AFTER Saville's death, it came to light that this odious man had keys to properties where he had the freedom to act out his depravities??

You're both try to convince BM that the higher echelons of power that have information that tracks spies and terrorists didn't have any info on well known public 'celebs'?

Well known guy that rubbed shoulders with the elite of the elites, nothing to see here...

Sounds like British 'Jeffrey Epstein' issue, doesn't it??
 
Was this the same Savile who was bessie mates with Thatcher and the present King?

Maybe I'm naive, but I would expect a person like that to be thoroughly checked by the security services, given that it's (part of) their duty to protect the public image of senior government ministers and the royals.

Either they found nothing - in which case the evidence was below prosecution standards.

OR - they found something and hushed it up. Sometimes the security services like to have a handle on public figures so they can 'influence' them.

As I am not the Head of MI5, I have no idea what the situation was.

Remember, this country has very strict libel laws. If you know that a prominent person is a pervert, you'd better have unimpeachable evidence to present in court. This incredibly strict libel law does a huge amount to protect corrupt individuals who happen to be wealthy or to have good connections. Lots of people apparently knew about Cyril Smith, but fuck all was done about it until he was dead. Why was that? You tell me.
 
For the first time in many years I am feeling hope for the future of our country.

In the 62 yrs I’ve been able to vote I voted, not always for the same party but never Tory, and I was reasonably satisfied with the way things were run until the past 14 or so years when I began to see the corruption and the blatant manipulation of both press and public. Now, hopefully, that time is behind us and we move into a new more open and honest government.
I just pray my hopes are not misguided.

Onwards and upwards. Onwards and upwards. *fingers crossed*

Sorry to break it to you but Starmer thinks John Stones is vastly overrated
 
Hahahahaha!!

Wait... So you're saying that the HEAD of the CPS, i.e., the director/ leader of the organisation had no overview of the decision??

Criticisms of HIS organisation, the CPS and the police for the handling of the case, but Sir Keef is above critique?? What??? make it make sense!

Okay, my pedigree chum...
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top