Lovebitesandeveryfing
Well-Known Member
PistonBlue said:blueinsa said:i8rags said:Rags had it won, bin dippers had it won, chelski have got it won, see where I'm going with this.
Couldn't agree more.
So much football to be played and many twists and turns left.
We have a proven record of coming back from far worse situations than this.
We do. Very worrying how little we seemed to be up for it yesterday though. Always a tough place to go obviously, but we had a chance to put Chelsea under a bit pressure and we just didn't look up to it. Reminded me of the cup final against Wigan.
Haven't got much to say, still hurting from yesterday. Fuck, but that hurts. I didn't expect it to hurt as much as 2012-13, but it does. It may even be worse.
Thing is this: I like your optimism, everybody, I really do. Mathematically possible, and we fight to the end and all that. It's not completely impossible that we go on a mental run and win everything here on in. Very little sign of it, difficult to see where it's going to come from, but not impossible. Stranger things have been done by this City team.
The plain fact is, though, that we're no longer in control of it. We've put it squarely in Chelsea's hands. They'd have to balls up in an entirely unexpected way. United in 2011-12 — that was a team playing past its sell-by date, running on the adrenalin created by the fear of one man. That they folded in the end is not that unnatural. LIverpool last year — a team that was dodgy in several areas, everyone could see that, but fuelled by an attack that was walking on air, and at the heart of which was a player, cannibal or not, who had a season that I am confident he will never repeat. This Chelsea team are not fantastic, but they're good managers of games, even when they're not all that impressive. They're far more balanced than Liverpool were, and they don't have the ageing problem that United had. I'd be astonished if they imploded the way the other two did. Hope you're right and I'm wrong.