Liverpool thread 2019/20

Status
Not open for further replies.
Kelechi scored 21 goals in 64 appearances for City.

Solanke scored 1 goal in 27 appearances for Liverpool.

Kelechi just seemed all wrong for Leicester's style of play.

Kelechi is pub player, about as good with the ball as Lescott was. You're right he had better stats and it was easier to sell him based n that, but Solanke is English and that automatically adds few millions to his price and he was at Chelsea, than Liverpool, that brings media bigging and stuff. On the end, both us and Liverpool took Leicester and Bournemouth to cleaners.
 
Kelechi is pub player, about as good with the ball as Lescott was. You're right he had better stats and it was easier to sell him based n that, but Solanke is English and that automatically adds few millions to his price and he was at Chelsea, than Liverpool, that brings media bigging and stuff. On the end, both us and Liverpool took Leicester and Bournemouth to cleaners.

Pub player. Bit harsh.
 
Wanting to maximise revenue and wanting what's best for the club aren't necessarily mutually exclusive.

I would say that the Glazers are the most malign owners in football, by a county mile; apart from possibly Owen Oysten. To me, they represent, much moreso than Henry, the apotheosis of that most unpleasant and avaricious of creatures, the American billionaire.
Just said the same to Mrs Gaz but only used a quarter of you're words ;-)
 
Over 100 criminal offences. That being every time they accessed Scout7 it was a criminal offence correct? If it was once it may as well be 1000 times really. Same crime repeated. Only £1m to make all these offences go away seems pretty cheap. I would have thought City would seek to punish Liverpool a little more than that.
As I said, it's bad sportsmanship. It was done to get the edge on transfers, I don't agree with it and it was wrong.
It is an offence to gain unauthorized access to a computer. The evidence is it was done over 100 times. Each time is a separate offence. A court would go down the specimen charges route.
The whole point of the confidential deal was that City had no desire to expose Liverpool to ridicule, a decency which subsequent events proved Liverpool did not match. In their shoes, I would not be complacent. The leaking, I suspect, was by City in response to Pool's latest effort to encourage unfounded accusations. Poke the hornet's nest and take the consequences,which may well be severe.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.