goalmole
Well-Known Member
Crowning someone king on the basis of hereditary privilege definitely isn't.That's democracy for you
That's why it's wrong and that's why people shouldn't respect it.
Crowning someone king on the basis of hereditary privilege definitely isn't.That's democracy for you
Because, as I said, it represents the establishment. Are you suggesting it doesn’t?If that was the case, why are the dippers booing GSTK seeing as its several governments that are at fault.
There is not much space for the centre ground these days. The country has been split apart by tribal politics. This doesn't usually end well.:)
People who agree with you are sane and people who don't agree with you presumably aren't? Not sure there is much point discussing respect with someone who has that basic principle.
Anyway, just for the record, I am not a monarchist, particularly, but I try to be a decent human being. Not much of a thing these days, but I am old .....
spot on, why are so shit scared to stand up for ourselves and have done with this ridiculous privilege....ii mean its like awarding the lottery to the same family each week! utter nonsenseCrowning someone king on the basis of hereditary privilege definitely isn't.
That's why it's wrong and that's why people shouldn't respect it.
Close call but I probably hate Thatcher more. Paisley was a decent man, Emlyn was a total cnut !!I bet you hate the 1 in the middle less
this is what we should be protesting about, arresting people for having a placard in the hands. Slippery slope. in all of these places such as the met they have massive portraits of the monarch on the wall. makes joining an establishment like that problematic for many. You end up with a tribe / cult - which a lot of people tar Liverpool with on here so what's the answer, try and create a fair inclusive society...like a republic may be?Got no problem with them booing the national anthem and wish more would do the same. They're making a protest about an archaic relic and without those protests nothing will ever change.
The fact that the Met saw fit to arrest and detain republican demonstrators yesterday says it all to me - absolutely disgusting
I agree everyone has the right to free thought, and for me the right to question it and think that the current model is shit and backwardFor me, because it remains part of the identity of this country which can be traced back over a thousand years.
You can't choose your family, nor the place you are born, but you can still find pride in all that it stands for and the many components that make this country a place to live in which many people die trying to get here.
Did he really sign up for the queen? or to see the world, learn a trade have a laugh, protect mates? just a genuine question i think all the above aside from queenie is fair. I mean tbh they wouldn't put your dad out f he was on fire tbh, his mates would. Maybe he would have ran around protected an unelected extremely wealthy lady but then again maybe notIm the same, I take nothing from the royal family - neither pride nor distain - but I respectfully keep my mouth shut for those who do.
My dad was in the military for over 25 years and in his mind he fought for his queen - how can I not at least keep my thoughts to myself when appropriate and respect ppl like that, who put their lives on the line for us.
Both are just posturing. I'm not an ardent monarchist by any means but whether we have a hereditary monarchy or not makes little or no practical difference to anyone's day-to-day life.Got no problem with them booing the national anthem and wish more would do the same. They're making a protest about an archaic relic and without those protests nothing will ever change.
The fact that the Met saw fit to arrest and detain republican demonstrators yesterday says it all to me - absolutely disgusting
By the people, for the people.this is what we should be protesting about, arresting people for having a placard in the hands. Slippery slope. in all of these places such as the met they have massive portraits of the monarch on the wall. makes joining an establishment like that problematic for many. You end up with a tribe / cult - which a lot of people tar Liverpool with on here so what's the answer, try and create a fair inclusive society...like a republic may be?
If they're booing the anthem down to personal choice/ hatred of the establishment and monarchy then I have no issue with that. But the impression I get is they're doing it as they believe it's part of the matchday experience and makes them edgy and controversial. By doing that they're bringing an element of shame on the city and club. A big part of their fanbase are from outside the city and few will have been affected by government decisions decades ago.
They purport to be this unique socialist club and maybe amongst their older fanbase that was true, I went school with many who were politically left wing but their fanbase now is totally different. They priced the local working class fans out of the stadium and they're not unique in that but they cling onto anti establishment mantra which leaves them open to massive claims of hypocrisy.
This is completely different surely you see that? Don't get me wrong i think manty Liverpool fans are trying too hard to create some sort of rebel image. I'm a staunch republic, so just wouldn't get anywhere near the anthem, wouldn't boo though as there are people who love it. But to criticise republicans because they don't believe n the monarchy is a dangerous slippery slope, Met arresting people for the way they were 'thinking' yesterday is prime exampleWheres our freedom of speech to sing 'always the victims'
It doesn't matter what I think, or reasons for this or that - what matters to him is his queen. In his words 'I fought for my queen'.Did he really sign up for the queen? or to see the world, learn a trade have a laugh, protect mates? just a genuine question i think all the above aside from queenie is fair. I mean tbh they wouldn't put your dad out f he was on fire tbh, his mates would. Maybe he would have ran around protected an unelected extremely wealthy lady but then again maybe not
I don't know maybe a % either way how do we know motives of individuals we haven't met - agree though that i bet there is a % that are trying to create some sort of image - if so that's pathetic. Others may have really strong feelings about tax payers money going to this fancy dress sham when Nurses are genuinely struggling ..just sayingThat’s exactly the reason they did it
Spot on pal.... that's what i mean so many have different motives, beliefs values. The right to voice these opinions is what makes a great free democracy. To criticise those who don't have same sentiments, and have the establishment shutting them down 9arests in London) is plain wrong and worryingIt doesn't matter what I think, or reasons for this or that - what matters to him is his queen. In his words 'I fought for my queen'.
So as much I don't disagree with you, I would guess that a lot of former military people feel the same and have earned me keeping my mouth closed for the national anthem.
I get that, but having a 70-odd year old man child being proclaimed as better than everyone else whilst he's got a gold hat on his head pisses people off. It might make minimal difference, but the optics of it are enough for people to say 'not in my name'Both are just posturing. I'm not an ardent monarchist by any means but whether we have a hereditary monarchy or not makes little or no practical difference to anyone's day-to-day life.
Tax payers money maybe?Both are just posturing. I'm not an ardent monarchist by any means but whether we have a hereditary monarchy or not makes little or no practical difference to anyone's day-to-day life.