I'm With Stupid
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 May 2013
- Messages
- 20,240
Well it's pretty significant if it brings in lots of money. But the question is how much are there worldwide fans actually worth? You've got merchandise sales, of course. But when it comes to commercial sponsorship, companies aren't really looking to advertise to a specific set of fans. They're trying to associate their brand with success and greatness. They want to sponsor City because they want to see Aguero in front of their logo or using their product, not because they particularly want to target City fans. Are companies really going to pay the same sort of money to see Henderson on their poster? It'd also be interesting to see how much these overseas merchandise sales are linked to success on the pitch. The match going fans are always going to be buying the shirts, but if they go 10 years in mid table, how many of their Aussie fans will be buying the shirt every year? I'd also be interested to know how much kids' products are responsible for merchandise sales, because I imagine that's something that can change very quickly.Arsenal, Chelsea, City, all lag miles behind those two - not that it's any real measure of much. Loads of people like General Motors cars, or Madonna - it's not saying much. Spouting about the size of a fanbase is like saying 'My car is the best selling car' or 'My band sold more records' whoopee!
I can't see Liverpool getting much worse than Spurs' sort of level due to their finances. Even without a worldwide fanbase, they'll always be well supported in the UK, and with their stadium expansion, I can't see them getting any worse in that respect. Unfortunately, the way football finances work nowadays, they rich are pretty much guaranteed to stay rich and the poor are pretty much guaranteed to stay poor, so save for some short-term fluctuations, or massive investment (and occasional subsequent collapse), the league will stay more or less as it is.