Did I say we would bid 80m for Mitoma though?
I said I would, I never said the club would.
If you are trying to compare Paqueta's CV to Mitoma's CV... I wouldn't bother. If you talk to most premier league fans they would say they'd rather have Mitoma in their side than Paqueta.
I value Mitoma higher than Paqueta because I think he's better.
You argued it would be a good fee, a bargain even, so I assumed you thought it was a goer for the club at that price.
What do you base knowing the opinion od most PL fans on?
Paqueta is unquestionably the more proven and acomplished player. And harder/more expensive to buy out of his contract.
Doesn't necessarily make him 'better' granted, although they play different roles.
Personally, not sure which I'd rather. Quite different impact on the overall team. I would agree that Mitoma would appear the more exciting, over a given 5-10 minutes, which is all you think you need.
I ultimately don't think Paqueta will get done though, think the price will be too Prohibitive. I think Mitoma would seem the more likely, purely because he would be a lot lot cheaper than Paqueta. But doesn't mean the club wouldn't rather pay more for Paqueta. I watch with interest.