Mancini (cont)

[moomba]

Not only do I not understand what the hell you wrote, I don't particularly care.

If you come on after the club makes an FA Cup final, a great achievement in the history of the club and talk nothing but negatives about it you should expect some criticism of your views. That's all I said back when, you chose to be offended by that.

You've been a troll of pretty much epic proportions. Bravo. I posted the honest fact that we were lucky with a couple of the ref decisions, and we were only dominant in the first half... and I was called a rag by probably 20+ people. If you didn't say that, I almost care.

It speaks volumes that I could clarify my position countless times, and yet it still doesn't sink in for dozens of people here. One poster literally repeated one of my points as if to point it out to me in contrast to what I as saying. Fucking hilarious.

No wonder you think I have an agenda, or "campaign". Truly comical. Obviously if Mancini is replaced, there will be very short memories about what was said in this thread.

Troll? PMSL.

 

[Dethred]

So in your own words, in previous posts, you started following City when we got promoted (given our history that is no definitive time frame)

Watched your first full match in 2003 (a downloaded one from the previous year)

And actively began supporting City when Sven was manager.

And you're on here saying what the owners might be thinking?

Seems legit..

You're right, because I haven't had access to all the matches, and didn't have access when City games weren't even being broadcast throughout England, much less abroad...

I am less likely to have an idea about what the objectives are for Mansour, who has been around since the beginning of 2008-2009.

Your logic, it overwhelms me.<br /><br />-- Mon Apr 15, 2013 1:44 pm --<br /><br />

Troll? PMSL.

Do you not see the hilarity and irony of it all? You're having a laugh and the post above you literally reinforced what I said... for the hundredth time, at least.

At least we're both laughing at it, but apparently for very different reasons.

 

[samharris]

So in your own words, in previous posts, you started following City when we got promoted (given our history that is no definitive time frame)

Watched your first full match in 2003 (a downloaded one from the previous year)

And actively began supporting City when Sven was manager.

And you're on here saying what the owners might be thinking?

Seems legit..

You're right, because I haven't had access to all the matches, and didn't have access when City games weren't even being broadcast throughout England, much less abroad...

I am less likely to have an idea about what the objectives are for Mansour, who has been around since the beginning of 2008-2009.

Your logic, it overwhelms me.

Oh by the way..it was page 88 that stony asked you..sorry I didnt get back sooner but had to change my pants,too much laughing makes me piss myself. !!

 

[pudge]

So in your own words, in previous posts, you started following City when we got promoted (given our history that is no definitive time frame)

Watched your first full match in 2003 (a downloaded one from the previous year)

And actively began supporting City when Sven was manager.

And you're on here saying what the owners might be thinking?

Seems legit..

You're right, because I haven't had access to all the matches, and didn't have access when City games weren't even being broadcast throughout England, much less abroad...

I am less likely to have an idea about what the objectives are for Mansour, who has been around since the beginning of 2008-2009.

Your logic, it overwhelms me.

I didn't say that so that's your on stupid applied logic.

My point is, what entitles you to comment on what the owners want?

Nothing is the answer by the way

 

[Davs 19]

Not only do I not understand what the hell you wrote, I don't particularly care.

If you come on after the club makes an FA Cup final, a great achievement in the history of the club and talk nothing but negatives about it you should expect some criticism of your views. That's all I said back when, you chose to be offended by that.

You've been a troll of pretty much epic proportions. Bravo. I posted the honest fact that we were lucky with a couple of the ref decisions, and we were only dominant in the first half... and I was called a rag by probably 20+ people. If you didn't say that, I almost care.

It speaks volumes that I could clarify my position countless times, and yet it still doesn't sink in for dozens of people here. One poster literally repeated one of my points as if to point it out to me in contrast to what I as saying. Fucking hilarious.

No wonder you think I have an agenda, or "campaign". Truly comical. Obviously if Mancini is replaced, there will be very short memories about what was said in this thread.

Moomba's a troll ??? Give your a head a shake my friend.........you say that what your posting doesn't 'sink in for dozens of people here'.........have you stopped to think why ? Have you considered why you seem to be in a minority of one ? Have you perhaps wondered whether it's because you generally post a load of negative bollocks in a particularly arrogant style ?

If not, you should.

 

[Dethred]

So in your own words, in previous posts, you started following City when we got promoted (given our history that is no definitive time frame)

Watched your first full match in 2003 (a downloaded one from the previous year)

And actively began supporting City when Sven was manager.

And you're on here saying what the owners might be thinking?

Seems legit..

You're right, because I haven't had access to all the matches, and didn't have access when City games weren't even being broadcast throughout England, much less abroad...

I am less likely to have an idea about what the objectives are for Mansour, who has been around since the beginning of 2008-2009.

Your logic, it overwhelms me.

Oh by the way..it was page 88 that stony asked you..sorry I didnt get back sooner but had to change my pants,too much laughing makes me piss myself. !!

I suggest Depends adult diapers.

 

[samharris]

You're right, because I haven't had access to all the matches, and didn't have access when City games weren't even being broadcast throughout England, much less abroad...

I am less likely to have an idea about what the objectives are for Mansour, who has been around since the beginning of 2008-2009.

Your logic, it overwhelms me.

Oh by the way..it was page 88 that stony asked you..sorry I didnt get back sooner but had to change my pants,too much laughing makes me piss myself. !!

I suggest Depends adult diapers.

Are you sure you dont want to be a stand up comic. ??

 

[Dethred]

I didn't say that so that's your on stupid applied logic.

My point is, what entitles you to comment on what the owners want?

Nothing is the answer by the way

No, but you implied it. I suppose there's almost a difference. Or did you mention when I began following City because that information enriches your life?

When have I ever said I know what the owners want? As a matter of fact, I made a point to say as much to another person a few posts ago.

Answer this please: Did the owners want to see progress?

(If your answer is anything but "no", then holy shit I must be a psychic.)

 

[moomba]

Do you not see the hilarity and irony of it all? You're having a laugh and the post above you literally reinforced what I said... for the hundredth time, at least.

At least we're both laughing at it, but apparently for very different reasons.

OK champ, whatever you reckon.

 

[Dethred]

Are you sure you dont want to be a stand up comic. ??

I didn't think it was funny at all. But I appreciate that you found it as such. ;-)