Mancini out? (merged)

Status
Not open for further replies.
fbloke said:
It seems that its 3 to 1 in favour of Mancini

<a class="postlink" href="http://twitpolls.com/s/1rA" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://twitpolls.com/s/1rA</a>

Only 44 people have voted so far, it's hardly conclusive.

I'm not a Mourinho fan btw.
 
stony said:
fbloke said:
It seems that its 3 to 1 in favour of Mancini

<a class="postlink" href="http://twitpolls.com/s/1rA" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://twitpolls.com/s/1rA</a>

Only 44 people have voted so far, it's hardly conclusive.

I'm not a Mourinho fan btw.

Ha,ha. You can only count the votes cast though ;-)
 
BlueDejong said:
Real Madrid have verbally agreed with Carlo Ancelotti to take over from Jose Mourinho in the summer.

from. Le Parisien

wow, Jose coming ?

where are you seeing this? Their website has a story saying Real Madrid might have interest, but nothing I can find about there being a verbal agreement?
 
Pablo1 said:
taconinja said:
The cookie monster said:
Overated?
You're right. Poor choice of words. Mourinho rates certain attributes like all managers do. I don't think Dzeko ticks the boxes Mourinho values.

-- Thu Feb 21, 2013 1:29 pm --

Pablo1 said:
Whatever critism Dzekos detractors have regarding his all round ability - there is no way he can be labelled a failure. If he is judged as a failure then the game of football is well and truly fucked.
I don't think he's a failure either. He was brought up by someone as an example of players not progressing, ie failures, under Mancini.

Yeah I saw that it didn't come from you mate, I just find it hard that anyone would think he's been a failure. Even if you don't rate him, he has done what's required as a striker and his scoring ratio is hard to dismiss.
No worries. These conversations get a bit jumbled at times when they move quickly.<br /><br />-- Thu Feb 21, 2013 1:59 pm --<br /><br />
gordondaviesmoustache said:
adrianr said:
Wenger to PSG would be interesting indeed..
I could see Laudrup going to Arsenal if that was the case.
That would be sort of scary when you consider it.
 
Interesting.

Ancelotti hired by Madrid sacked by Chelsea. Shows what Roman knows?

I reckon Carlo will do a fantastic job. He's much more like del Bosque than Jose.

Paris would offer Wenger an escape route. Jose wouldn't go there. Would Arsenal have him?

Benitez to Gooners? Jose to Chelsea.

Mancini nowhere that is how it looks to me.
 
City and Pellegrini reach a verbal agreement: <a class="postlink" href="http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.24horas.cl%2Fdeportes%2Ffutbol-internacional%2Fmanuel-pellegrini-llega-a-un-acuerdo-de-palabra-con-el-city-521795" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://translate.google.com/translate?h ... ity-521795</a>
 
sergiokun said:
Don’t blame Mancini for the signings when he wanted Rvp, De Rossi and a top class winger but got Garcia, Rodwell and Sinclair and people wonder why we failed in champions league. He spent 40+ million on players he didn’t want but felt he needed more players in case of injuries etc.

He was clearly told you can’t have big players on big wages or he would of gone out and got who he wanted and yes with the team we have we should be doing better but we needed more top players for Europe what he wasn’t allowed so his only mistake was selling in the summer and buying dross he didn’t want. I rate Rodwell and Garcia is getting better but clearly they was not the players Mancini wished for
He was told we wouldn't spend unlimited mounts of money without freeing up some first which won't surprise anyone. RVP is a good example of that. The deal was in place and personal terms agreed late in 2011, ready for the summer transfer window. But he was told one of the four main strikers had to go (and, I think, which one it would be) and he effectively refused to allow that when there was a good possibility of a deal being struck. So RVP went to the rags. De Rossi simply didn't want to come, whatever Mancini wanted.
 
LoveCity said:
City and Pellegrini reach a verbal agreement: <a class="postlink" href="http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.24horas.cl%2Fdeportes%2Ffutbol-internacional%2Fmanuel-pellegrini-llega-a-un-acuerdo-de-palabra-con-el-city-521795" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://translate.google.com/translate?h ... ity-521795</a>




i dont believe this.


i wouldnt be jumping up and down if it was true, i`d like simione
 
LoveCity said:
City and Pellegrini reach a verbal agreement: <a class="postlink" href="http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.24horas.cl%2Fdeportes%2Ffutbol-internacional%2Fmanuel-pellegrini-llega-a-un-acuerdo-de-palabra-con-el-city-521795" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://translate.google.com/translate?h ... ity-521795</a>
Well that's that cleared up then.
See ya Bob.
 
LoveCity said:
City and Pellegrini reach a verbal agreement: <a class="postlink" href="http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.24horas.cl%2Fdeportes%2Ffutbol-internacional%2Fmanuel-pellegrini-llega-a-un-acuerdo-de-palabra-con-el-city-521795" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://translate.google.com/translate?h ... ity-521795</a>
It's not worth the paper it's written on.
 
LoveCity said:
City and Pellegrini reach a verbal agreement: <a class="postlink" href="http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.24horas.cl%2Fdeportes%2Ffutbol-internacional%2Fmanuel-pellegrini-llega-a-un-acuerdo-de-palabra-con-el-city-521795" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://translate.google.com/translate?h ... ity-521795</a>

yes man and a lack of ambition if true, not won a thing, no experience in England, no better an option than Mancini imo, little threat to the Rags as well.
 
I know Pellagrini has a good rep as a tactician and getting the best out of teams. Apart from Real he has a good record
 
Gaylord du Bois said:
LoveCity said:
City and Pellegrini reach a verbal agreement: <a class="postlink" href="http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.24horas.cl%2Fdeportes%2Ffutbol-internacional%2Fmanuel-pellegrini-llega-a-un-acuerdo-de-palabra-con-el-city-521795" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://translate.google.com/translate?h ... ity-521795</a>
Well that's that cleared up then.
See ya Bob.

I don't mind supporters questioning Mancini and wanting a change, but when stories are put on here presented as fact when clearly it's more speculation, well that's just not cricket!
 
Pablo1 said:
Gaylord du Bois said:
LoveCity said:
City and Pellegrini reach a verbal agreement: <a class="postlink" href="http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.24horas.cl%2Fdeportes%2Ffutbol-internacional%2Fmanuel-pellegrini-llega-a-un-acuerdo-de-palabra-con-el-city-521795" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://translate.google.com/translate?h ... ity-521795</a>
Well that's that cleared up then.
See ya Bob.

I don't mind supporters questioning Mancini and wanting a change, but when stories are put on here presented as fact when clearly it's more speculation, well that's just not cricket!

I've been told that 24Horas in Chile is "very serious media" ala the BBC, they're reporting it as fact. They said roughly "strong rumours in recent days are now fact" and remember Pellegrini is Chilean. I'm not saying the story is true but it can't be dismissed like a "MANCINI FACING THE AXE!" Daily Star headline.
 
smiles said:
I know Pellagrini has a good rep as a tactician and getting the best out of teams. Apart from Real he has a good record

He actually did ok for Real, 96 points wasn't it?

I doubt the eligibility of the source either way, but who knows.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top