Yaya_Tony said:
BillyShears said:
Oh it's not important, sorry if i gave that impression. Just because your posts are so short i thought i'd ask.
Genuine question BS, do you think that part of the reason potential future managers are discussed so much on here is because of our history (meaning many different managers, that never got us anywhere)?
You know where I stand, and I you, it is City first. Discussing faults and areas to improve with the current boss is quite different to discussing a replacement. Watching the scum with taggart has just rubbed salt in the wounds for 20 years, maybe why some hope for managerial stability. On the same note, if things aren't perfect then our de-facto response is to change managers. Is this a hangover from the bad old days?
I think it's dangerous generalising about why people want to discuss changing managers. Right now I think there's genuinely quite a few blues who deep down harbour reservations about whether Mancini is in fact the correct guy to take us forward, despite everything he's achieved here so far. As someone who falls into that category I've got no problem discussing potential replacements.
Is it wrong to harbour reservations about Mancini ? I get the impression quite a few people believe that.
-- Mon Feb 18, 2013 12:21 am --
waspish said:
Glad you changed your Mind and your right he should see out his contract and stack those trophies HIGH..
;)
C'mon mate, don't duck the question. You've posted loads of times that you think Mancini should get two more seasons. Why only two ?