Mancini Outers - Who do you suggest?

[blue_paul]

I'm not a Mancini outer, although he needs to improve significantly for me, but your question is one that annoys me with regards to this issue. It assumes that you HAVE to have the answer to who replaces Mancini in order for your opinion on him being removed to be "valid". That's simply not the case, you can see someone isnt right for the role without knowing who would be right.

I agree with that.

As I posted earlier, if the decision-makers at the club do decide to wield the axe, they might decide to hand pick the man they see as a long-term replacement and get him at all costs, evn if it's mid-season.

If they do, that's a hell of a lot of working, successful,managers to consider.

I certainly don't want him sacked either but agree with the points above. If the owners decide he's not good wnough then he wuld have to be sacked and replaced. Anyway, i can't see our owners running out of patience and what is quite obvioulsy a work in progress. We are yet to click this season apart from two excellent performances against l'poo and Chelsea.
As for no manager being available, this makes me laugh. IF the owners were to weild the axe, here's just a few top managers that would be interested:

Van Gaal
Klinnsman
Joachim Lowe
Hitzfeld
Del Bosque

All names that could be considered that City could chase up.

 

[selim]

Hiddink is not avilable,he is managing turkey.
Lets be realistic,Hiddink or Hitzfeld wouldn't break their contracts to manage us whatever money we offer them.

 

[Ricster]

For those that are saying Loew, look at how well Scolari had Porugal playing and then what happened at Chelsea.

 

[sweep]

I agree with that.

As I posted earlier, if the decision-makers at the club do decide to wield the axe, they might decide to hand pick the man they see as a long-term replacement and get him at all costs, evn if it's mid-season.

If they do, that's a hell of a lot of working, successful,managers to consider.

I certainly don't want him sacked either but agree with the points above. If the owners decide he's not good wnough then he wuld have to be sacked and replaced. Anyway, i can't see our owners running out of patience and what is quite obvioulsy a work in progress. We are yet to click this season apart from two excellent performances against l'poo and Chelsea.
As for no manager being available, this makes me laugh. IF the owners were to weild the axe, here's just a few top managers that would be interested:

Van Gaal
Klinnsman
Joachim Lowe
Hitzfeld
Del Bosque

All names that could be considered that City could chase up.

And none of them are any less risky than Mancini, I think we'd have to go into complete meltdown before the owners would consider change for another unproven manager.

 

[selim]

I certainly don't want him sacked either but agree with the points above. If the owners decide he's not good wnough then he wuld have to be sacked and replaced. Anyway, i can't see our owners running out of patience and what is quite obvioulsy a work in progress. We are yet to click this season apart from two excellent performances against l'poo and Chelsea.
As for no manager being available, this makes me laugh. IF the owners were to weild the axe, here's just a few top managers that would be interested:

Van Gaal
Klinnsman
Joachim Lowe
Hitzfeld
Del Bosque

All names that could be considered that City could chase up.

And none of them are any less risky than Mancini, I think we'd have to go into complete meltdown before the owners would consider change for another unproven manager.

You saying Hitzfeld,Del Bosque and Van Gaal are risky?

 

[m27]

Personally mate, if City were to sack Bob in the near future then I percieve the only manager we would go for would be Hiddinck.

Capello would be an option but would be extremely difficult to get him out of his England contract at short notice.

Prob right with Hiddink as he certainly takes absolutely no shit, but as for Capello, i would'nt want him tbh, maybe 5 year ago but i am not keen to say the least.
Mara'?(if he spoke english).

Like it or not, Capello will be on the shortlist if the time comes. I'm pretty sure of that.

The FA might be praying for it to happen. It would certainly get them out of a hole.

 

[Glasgow Man City]

And none of them are any less risky than Mancini, I think we'd have to go into complete meltdown before the owners would consider change for another unproven manager.

You saying Hitzfeld,Del Bosque and Van Gaal are risky?

I would, all proven in foreign leagues as was Mancini, but no idea of the British game, just like Mancini.

 

[sweep]

And none of them are any less risky than Mancini, I think we'd have to go into complete meltdown before the owners would consider change for another unproven manager.

You saying Hitzfeld,Del Bosque and Van Gaal are risky?

Yes.

 

[buzzer1]

You saying Hitzfeld,Del Bosque and Van Gaal are risky?

Yes.

I'd deffo give that Loew(sp!) my backing, Hiddink top grade 'n' all, but who reckons we need a bit of Passion and flamboyancy for a change, someone that has a great and close relationship with the fans, a bonding and togetherness linking the fans, players and management together and to get some colour and much needed atmos to our ground, someone who does'nt give a fuk?

 

[bri an t]

cant believe people want to sack him after 3 match loss,the same old saying you have to give him time and back him, and we all have to stick together and work our way out of this blip.