Mancini Outers - Who do you suggest?

[Mancio]

if you promise to send me back Mancini to Inter i will do you the right name:


André Villas Boas

 

[m27]

Seriously who is available at this given time to manage should we fire Mancini?

I can't think of many unless we poach someone like Redknapp, Wenger?, not much chance though.

I don't want O'neill, I don't want Rijkard, their is not many choices available

After thinking about this for a couple of days, I've convinced myself the man for the job is........







Alex McLeish.

Good man manager, good tactician, learned under "That twat at the Swamp" and has managed with more money than his rivals & under pressure at Rangers.

Is this some kind of sick joke?

 

[Matty]

I'm not a Mancini outer, although he needs to improve significantly for me, but your question is one that annoys me with regards to this issue. It assumes that you HAVE to have the answer to who replaces Mancini in order for your opinion on him being removed to be "valid". That's simply not the case, you can see someone isnt right for the role without knowing who would be right.

 

[m27]

I'm not a Mancini outer, although he needs to improve significantly for me, but your question is one that annoys me with regards to this issue. It assumes that you HAVE to have the answer to who replaces Mancini in order for your opinion on him being removed to be "valid". That's simply not the case, you can see someone isnt right for the role without knowing who would be right.

I agree with that.

As I posted earlier, if the decision-makers at the club do decide to wield the axe, they might decide to hand pick the man they see as a long-term replacement and get him at all costs, evn if it's mid-season.

If they do, that's a hell of a lot of working, successful,managers to consider.

 

[itsnevereasy]

terry venables

Interesting answer. I don't want Mancini out as the media would have a field day and we could further unsettle the team (if it is unsettled)

 

[bluefandk]

I'm not a Mancini outer, although he needs to improve significantly for me, but your question is one that annoys me with regards to this issue. It assumes that you HAVE to have the answer to who replaces Mancini in order for your opinion on him being removed to be "valid". That's simply not the case, you can see someone isnt right for the role without knowing who would be right.

I think you are wrong mate if you want the maneger sacked then you have to have a replacement in mind who you think would do a better job.

Attacking the maneger without having a clue who realisticly woould come in and do a better job is pointless.

Debating where you feel the maneger needs to improve is actually being positve imho.

 

[Glasgow Man City]

Is this some kind of sick joke?

No, not at all.

I think he would do a good job, but I think our owners would want a "bigger name"

 

[m27]

Is this some kind of sick joke?

No, not at all.

I think he would do a good job, but I think our owners would want a "bigger name"

I think you're on safe ground with that assumption.

 

[Glasgow Man City]

No, not at all.

I think he would do a good job, but I think our owners would want a "bigger name"

I think you're on safe ground with that assumption.

A "big name" isn't always for the best though.

 

[chinley blues]

proven prem manager is what we need, martin o'neil springs to mind, get him in before liverpool do