Mancini v Pellegrini so far ......

[OB1]

No... I agree this thread may be a tad premature but MAY FFS.... when we're mid-table and out of the CL and FA Cup.

Pellegrini can be judged on a game by game basis.

So far for me 3/10.

I'd say 6 out of 9.

I see what you did there...like it ;0)

Thank you :)

 

[Balti]

If we are to have a daft thread, I'll throw a daft stat in for you.

Mancini's win % is 59.16.
Pellegrini's is 66.66.

actually in terms of career win stats the current totals are:

Mancini 56.39%
Pellegrini 49.72%

including today

not looking like an upgrade so far is it?

....but then no doubt we're all much more holistic and stuff

 

[Phil1]

If we are to have a daft thread, I'll throw a daft stat in for you.

Mancini's win % is 59.16.
Pellegrini's is 66.66.

actually in terms of career win stats the current totals are:

Mancini 56.39%
Pellegrini 49.72%

including today

not looking like an upgrade so far is it?

....but then no doubt we're all much more holistic and stuff

Wonder if that made OB1 smile?

 

[chesterbells]

If we are to have a daft thread, I'll throw a daft stat in for you.

Mancini's win % is 59.16.
Pellegrini's is 66.66.

actually in terms of career win stats the current totals are:

Mancini 56.39%
Pellegrini 49.72%

including today

not looking like an upgrade so far is it?

....but then no doubt we're all much more holistic and stuff

You know, I think what the OP was getting at was comparing them both at city, not their overall careers, so whole career stats & the type & amount of trophies they've won, and their success relative to pounds/euros spent etc is all a bit irrelevant.

Anyway, great idea for a thread this one; think it's got potential.

 

[OB1]

If we are to have a daft thread, I'll throw a daft stat in for you.

Mancini's win % is 59.16.
Pellegrini's is 66.66.

actually in terms of career win stats the current totals are:

Mancini 56.39%
Pellegrini 49.72%

including today

not looking like an upgrade so far is it?

....but then no doubt we're all much more holistic and stuff

Wonder if that made OB1 smile?

No; it made me snigger at the idea of comparing time at moneybags Inter to time at Villarreal or...

 

[Phil1]

actually in terms of career win stats the current totals are:

Mancini 56.39%
Pellegrini 49.72%

including today

not looking like an upgrade so far is it?

....but then no doubt we're all much more holistic and stuff

Wonder if that made OB1 smile?

No; it made me snigger at the idea of comparing time at moneybags Inter to time at Villarreal or...

So we can agree that all comparisons are a bit daft at this point?

 

[cris3000]

If we are to have a daft thread, I'll throw a daft stat in for you.

Mancini's win % is 59.16.
Pellegrini's is 66.66.

actually in terms of career win stats the current totals are:

Mancini 56.39%
Pellegrini 49.72%

including today

not looking like an upgrade so far is it?

....but then no doubt we're all much more holistic and stuff

Mancini was managing INTER when other sides got destroyed by Calciopoli, he had it easier than any other time of Serie A's existance. The other was managing Villarreal, an mediocre La Liga side and got further than Mancini ever did in Europe. Pellegrini has a 66% winrate@River Plate and 75% at Real Madrid.


I am not a City fan, but Mancini was never a great manager. He was fortunate to manage Inter at that time to boost his credentials. He has managed 2 clubs that were not oil-funded Lazio and Fiorentina. Former had 48% win rate, latter had 22% win rate.

 

[Bluemoon115]

Wonder if that made OB1 smile?

No; it made me snigger at the idea of comparing time at moneybags Inter to time at Villarreal or...

So we can agree that all comparisons are a bit daft at this point?

That was the point of my post, to show that anything now is ridiculous (like pulling up a win % after 3 games).

 

[Mike N]

We've got a new manager. I've moved on and I think it would be a good idea if other fans did the same.

It's not about moving on, it's a thread discussing the new manager's performance and one of the best ways to do that is to compare to the previous. Maybe this thread isn't for you?

So it doesnt matter that it is completely irrelevant? Compare our present manager to a former manager. Like we are going to get the old one back if he's better than the current one? Wont happen.

Really, it's time for people like you to move on.

 

[OB1]

Wonder if that made OB1 smile?

No; it made me snigger at the idea of comparing time at moneybags Inter to time at Villarreal or...

So we can agree that all comparisons are a bit daft at this point?

We can indeed.