Mancini's future

[Bill]

when its 4-0 to city on sat bob will be in the clear:)

 

[hgblue]

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.uefa.com/MultimediaFiles/Download/Regulations/competitions/Regulations/01/48/42/49/1484249_DOWNLOAD.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.uefa.com/MultimediaFiles/Dow ... WNLOAD.pdf</a>

page 56 subsection (G)



That's a CL stipulation, not a namby pamby rule such as the one that the BBC try and enforce for the Prem. Hell UEFA run a tight ship, they move fans from rows 1&2 for extra sponsor space ffs.

I'll lecture you quite happily thanks. Second guessing without a shred of empathy for the situation is hardly fair is it?

How should Mancini have handled the question about not putting a striker on given the fact he HAD to attend a post match interview AND a press conference? Please enlighten me. Even if he'd broken the rules and not attended then the press would have torn him a new one for not explaining his lack of a striking substituion. Why should he take the flak for Tevez's gross misconduct? A retraction would be fine if you can't come up with a suitable solution.

I'll hold up my hands and admit I didn't know it was a condition that a press conference for a manager is an obligation in the CL. Being a City fan the whole situation is quite new to me after all, so good for you that you did the homework.
However, where did I say that he should take the flak for the Tevez situation? All I was pointing out is that Tevez 'played' him. If you cant see that then I can't add anything more.

By not answering the question put to him "Why did you not bring Tevez on?", he would have been slaughtered for not trying to win (or atleast come back into) the game against Bayern. That is how he'd have taken the flak Mack. Not rocket science and I'm not being funny.

Tevez played no one., Tevez and his camp are in the shit and know it. If anything Mancini has "played" him and Kia. He now has almost unanimous support to rid the club of a player he doesn't want to work with.

So poor Roberto would have been slaughtered would he? My heart fucking bleeds. How about putting the clubs best interests ahead of his own gigantic ego for once? You got one thing right though, Mancini got exactly what he wanted. Very clever.

 

[mcmanus]

In that bullshit article I just read BosnianDiamond it says

"People are saying that he is a disgrace because he refused to play in Munich on Tuesday night, but did you see the faces of the other players on that bench? They all looked dejected."

Zabs could not have put it more simply to Tevez than with that look of disgust like he was a bronzed 80 year old sicilian boss who had found a cheating rat. Love ya Zabs

 

[SWP's back]

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.uefa.com/MultimediaFiles/Download/Regulations/competitions/Regulations/01/48/42/49/1484249_DOWNLOAD.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.uefa.com/MultimediaFiles/Dow ... WNLOAD.pdf</a>

page 56 subsection (G)



That's a CL stipulation, not a namby pamby rule such as the one that the BBC try and enforce for the Prem. Hell UEFA run a tight ship, they move fans from rows 1&2 for extra sponsor space ffs.

I'll lecture you quite happily thanks. Second guessing without a shred of empathy for the situation is hardly fair is it?

How should Mancini have handled the question about not putting a striker on given the fact he HAD to attend a post match interview AND a press conference? Please enlighten me. Even if he'd broken the rules and not attended then the press would have torn him a new one for not explaining his lack of a striking substituion. Why should he take the flak for Tevez's gross misconduct? A retraction would be fine if you can't come up with a suitable solution.

I'll hold up my hands and admit I didn't know it was a condition that a press conference for a manager is an obligation in the CL. Being a City fan the whole situation is quite new to me after all, so good for you that you did the homework.
However, where did I say that he should take the flak for the Tevez situation? All I was pointing out is that Tevez 'played' him. If you cant see that then I can't add anything more.

It's not a condition that you have to answer a question in a specific way,perhaps no one around him had the balls to tell him to calm down and think before he spoke.
He's shite at TV interviews at the best of times,that's just the way it is.

I ask again and it seems you are an expert.

How does Mancini answer the question "Why did you not put Tevez [a striker] on?"

Oh that's it, you can't.

 

[Josh Blue]

SWPs back pretending he knows it all again.

 

[SWP's back]

I'll hold up my hands and admit I didn't know it was a condition that a press conference for a manager is an obligation in the CL. Being a City fan the whole situation is quite new to me after all, so good for you that you did the homework.
However, where did I say that he should take the flak for the Tevez situation? All I was pointing out is that Tevez 'played' him. If you cant see that then I can't add anything more.

By not answering the question put to him "Why did you not bring Tevez on?", he would have been slaughtered for not trying to win (or atleast come back into) the game against Bayern. That is how he'd have taken the flak Mack. Not rocket science and I'm not being funny.

Tevez played no one., Tevez and his camp are in the shit and know it. If anything Mancini has "played" him and Kia. He now has almost unanimous support to rid the club of a player he doesn't want to work with.

So poor Roberto would have been slaughtered would he? My heart fucking bleeds. How about putting the clubs best interests ahead of his own gigantic ego for once? You got one thing right though, Mancini got exactly what he wanted. Very clever.

He did. The club have got rid of a cancer.

He also has the support of 90% of the fanbase.

 

[remoh]

This and only this.

If people looked a little deeper, perhaps they'd be chanting for our owner, rather than Roberto.
What League position do you think we 'd have had in more normal financial circumstances under Mancini? and how far ahead of the Rags might we have been with a manager who could have handled, and seen the value of, Bellamy, Adebayor, Ireland, Tevez and Petrov and Given, who have all been sold cheaply or sent on loan?
Loyalty is essential, but it should be to the Club, not our present, blundering manager

We chant for both fella. Shocked you aren't aware of this.

And you see no contradiction in that? I would if it was my money going in there.

 

[Gaylord du Bois]

50 mill? Who ever wanted to pay 50 mill for Tevez?

The only person refusing to do his job is Tevez.

Only people who knows fuck all about flltball would blame this on Mancini.

-- Thu Sep 29, 2011 10:36 pm --



Who is stopping them from having their say?

They are having their say and so am I.

Stop trying to play the victim card its boring and pathetic.

i wont pretend to know what the fuck you are on about except that by saying people "know fuck all about football" because they have different view to you is a bit precious sunshine.

Sunshine? Are you now pretending to star in some movie or what is that all about dear?

In my humble opinion they know nothing about football, thats what this board is all bout expressing your opinion.

If they think Im wrong they are welcome to prove me wrong.

I wont be holding my breath though.

Fuck me, are you Peter Scheimcel ?

 

[bluefandk]

SWPs back pretending he knows it all again.

Why dont you explain to us all why he is wrong?

Or is all you want to contribute with personal attacks?

 

[SWP's back]

SWPs back pretending he knows it all again.

Josh blue not adding anything due to his penchant for being a fence sitting vanilla again.

Piss off kid unless you have something to add.