dennistueartismyhero
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Apr 2011
- Messages
- 401
Poor signings playing at their normal level coupled with great players not putting it in mean our level of play is susbstandard. Not all down to the manager.
I know you did, lots of us said the players were at fault & we were fuckin lambasted for it............de niro said:The cookie monster said:This was all said two years ago yet posters on here were adamant they are professional sportsman and they wouldn't do such a thingde niro said:on the money.
It was the manager who was at fault he's at the helm to motivate them, that was the line they constantly used, now its their fault though........
i didn't. i said at the time we should hoof the lot of them, can't have the tail wagging the dog. i even said they will do it to the next guy and they have.
problem for mancini is the chairman and co came fown on the side of the players, this time pellers is thier own man. lets see how this one pans out.
alib said:Changes the defence far far too much
You never see Chelsea mess about with their back 4?
de niro said:The cookie monster said:This was all said two years ago yet posters on here were adamant they are professional sportsman and they wouldn't do such a thingde niro said:on the money.
It was the manager who was at fault he's at the helm to motivate them, that was the line they constantly used, now its their fault though........
i didn't. i said at the time we should hoof the lot of them, can't have the tail wagging the dog. i even said they will do it to the next guy and they have.
problem for mancini is the chairman and co came fown on the side of the players, this time pellers is thier own man. lets see how this one pans out.
I don't really care, because all along I've been of the opinion that what ever combination of 4's 3's 2's and 1's we play, its got far more to do with how the players are playing than anything else. Currently that's shit, barring one or two, and no fannying about with formations is going to change that fact, a few need to take some responsibility.moomba said:Looked more a 4-2-3-1 than a 4-3-2-1..cleavers said:Is that why he refers to 4-3-2-1 for QPR, and 4-3-2-1 for City in the post ?mancity1 said:I think he was referring to Harry's 4-4-2 stacked up against our 4-4-2.