Manuel Pellegrini (cont)

Status
Not open for further replies.
grim up north said:
sam-caddick said:
Klopp or Simeone will be managing City next season in my opinion.

Pellegrini is a decent manager and was the right man post-Mancini to sort our dressing room out, but he isn't a great manager and there will be better managers available in the summer.

50p says they won't in my opinion obviously


Haha, who is your money on mate?

I genuinely don't see Pellegrini here next season.
 
sam-caddick said:
grim up north said:
sam-caddick said:
Klopp or Simeone will be managing City next season in my opinion.

Pellegrini is a decent manager and was the right man post-Mancini to sort our dressing room out, but he isn't a great manager and there will be better managers available in the summer.

50p says they won't in my opinion obviously


Haha, who is your money on mate?

I genuinely don't see Pellegrini here next season.

Pellers wil be here till Pep tips up
 
Marvin said:
I thought Fernando once again played well. He is a defensive midfielder, and does that job very well.

If the other players did their job as well as he did his then we would be OK.

And the other player picked on is Navas and he was once again our best attacking threat

We lost because we crumbled after Boro scored. And beause Pellegrini made the wrong subs. He should have left Navas on. Why he took him off I don't know. Players like Aguero and Kompany are not fit. The only good thing is that the got another 90 minutes under their belts

Kompany's poor form has got nothing to do with tactics and everything to do with his attitude. What was he doing trying to dribble past their forwards in his own penalty area? Always tries to showboat. He needs to cut that out.

Mate did you honestly see the game? Fernando was awful he wins very little ball and his part in the first goal was pathetic.
 
Many of our players aren't right for the way Simeone plays with some exceptions. Half of their goals come from set-pieces... they defend with 10 and like to counter attack while working their arses off. Even their winger Turan is a hard bastard who grafts. They're like a team of Spartans. They don't often control possession except against really bad teams. His style just doesn't seem to fit us which is a bit of a shame. Because his football isn't pretty but it works and would probably do very well in Europe. We'd be more like Chelsea without the personnel Chelsea have to be that sort of team. The City Football Group style is about beautiful football (in concept if not always in practice), control, possession, attractive on the eye attacking football. That's not the Simeone way at all. The DNA we've created for the club is more Pellegrini/Pep/De Boer/Koeman... with some adjustments maybe Klopp but gegenpressing could fatigue a squad with the schedule of City.
 
I'm fairly sure that MP will be here until summer 2016. Then Pep will take over.

What Pellers will oversee is the beginning of the transition where several of the senior players will be replaced, Start with the obvious, such as Yaya, and then work your way down.
 
LoveCity said:
Many of our players aren't right for the way Simeone plays with some exceptions. Half of their goals come from set-pieces... they defend with 10 and like to counter attack while working their arses off. Even their winger Turan is a hard bastard who grafts. They're like a team of Spartans. They don't often control possession except against really bad teams. His style just doesn't seem to fit us which is a bit of a shame. Because his football isn't pretty but it works and would probably do very well in Europe. We'd be more like Chelsea without the personnel Chelsea have to be that sort of team. The City Football Group style is about beautiful football (in concept if not always in practice), control, possession, attractive on the eye attacking football. That's not the Simeone way at all. The DNA we've created for the club is more Pellegrini/Pep/De Boer/Koeman... with some adjustments maybe Klopp but gegenpressing could fatigue a squad with the schedule of City.
this
 
I wish he'd lose it, just once. I need to see some passion in him.

'Manuel, how do you feel now you know it was John Terry shagging your missus?.....

'Errr, we err, are in a difficult moment, but we err, are trying to make this err moment not such an ermm important moment.

Sort it out Manuel, give them the fucking hairdryer.
 
rushts said:
I wish he'd lose it, just once. I need to see some passion in him.

'Manuel, how do you feel now you know it was John Terry shagging your missus?.....

'Errr, we err, are in a difficult moment, but we err, are trying to make this err moment not such an ermm important moment.

Sort it out Manuel, give them the fucking hairdryer.

I'm sure he has a public persona and in private a totally different guy
 
grim up north said:
rushts said:
I wish he'd lose it, just once. I need to see some passion in him.

'Manuel, how do you feel now you know it was John Terry shagging your missus?.....

'Errr, we err, are in a difficult moment, but we err, are trying to make this err moment not such an ermm important moment.

Sort it out Manuel, give them the fucking hairdryer.

I'm sure he has a public persona and in private a totally different guy


I hope so mate. I hope they all got a right bollocking for that before.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.